Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
•Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is blatantly obvious that the idea of having the ability to correct the mistake to lead a perfect life has gained widespread currency in all societies. While some people hold the view that it is necessary to keep the calmness of a meeting or a class when one mistake is occurred by an instructor, some others hold an opposing viewpoint and believe that not only it should be noticed right away but also, it helps to have a professional meeting or teaching. I support the opinion that any mistake should be indicated right away at the moment. In what follows, I will elaborate on my standpoint.
It is an indisputable fact that any logical conversation is based on the statements of the audiences in the meeting or in the class. To clarify this concept, when teachers want to begin a session of the lessons, they teach students based on their knowledge. As a result, if there would be some mistakes in their teaching process, students would consider the teacher's statements as a fundamental basis for their knowledge such as what they have to use in the exams. Additionally, if any of students raise her/his hand right away after the teacher's mistake, not only s/he would help the teacher to manage the class properly, but also s/he would prevent from further misconceptions of students. Take a personal experience as an example; I remember that when I was a high-school student, one time our mathematics teacher was teaching a hard section of algebra. Due to my previous study in this field, I knew that the approach which teacher is using is not correct and it would mislead other students in their exams, so, I decided to raise my hand and tell the proper approach to the teacher. Surprisingly, he confirmed my view and told other students that, had not I told the correct method, he would not have been able to teach the right subject to them.
Furthermore, another equally remarkable point substantiating my outlook is that telling the mistakes to the instructor, not only helps others to learn more but also, it enables the teacher/ leader of the meeting to correct himself right away. It is axiomatic that sometimes individuals' statements have critical consequences. In other words, in some negotiations for international trades between countries, just one mistake word could have negative effects on the future of the country. Consequently, it would be better if other persons who present in the meeting, correct the person's statement in order to be prevented from future thorny issues. As a case in point, sometimes ago, my country had an international negotiation with five other countries for creating some special routes between them in order to provide better trades for its merchants. I read in the news that one of the members of our negotiation team made a serious mistake in one of the meetings, and because of the presence of some other skilled persons in that team, they could compensate the rigor. As a result, they could have a positive meeting with great boons for our country.
Taking all the aforementioned into account, one can logically conclude that it is much better to tell any mistake at the moment instead of telling them after a while. This is because not only it prevents from further misconceptions, but also, it helps the instructor or teacher to correct himself and some times prevents from detrimental results which can be occurred even at the level of international.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 577, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...who present in the meeting, correct the persons statement in order to be prevented from...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, look, so, while, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2844.0 1977.66487455 144% => OK
No of words: 581.0 407.700716846 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89500860585 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90957651803 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80533879094 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452667814114 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 877.5 618.680645161 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.4212898008 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.2 100.406767564 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.05 20.6045352989 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16513832836 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546252987241 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482377494049 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106887165463 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402724416826 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.