TPO13
The lecture and the article are both about selling fossils to individual collections. The author feels that sale of fossils to individuals is harmful not only for scientists bot olso general public and provide three reasons of support. The lecture challenges the claim made by the article, he is of the opinion that these explanations are faulty.
To begine with, the author states that the public suffers because the private collectors dont allow the people to view their collection. The specific argument is challenged by the lectur. He claims that the big sale of the fossils make buying these valuable fossils easier for schools and universities and some private museum. Therfore there are fossils in every where and more people can see them.
secondly, the author mentions that scientists miss this crutial fossils which have a lot of important information about the extinct species. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that every fossil that discovered should be investigate by the scientists. Fossils are assessing by the scientists and after that they can be sold by individuals. Therefore the important information of them do not miss out.
Last but not least, The writer posits that the individual who dicover fossils are not educated and they ignor the positions of the fossils which is very critical for science. In contrast, the lecturer position is that if individuals find more fossils, it will be more valuable for science to have a bonch of fossils than have information about the sites of fossils.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...armful not only for scientists bot olso general public and provide three reasons of support. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...c and provide three reasons of support. The lecture challenges the claim made by th...
^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... suffers because the private collectors dont allow the people to view their collect...
^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecause the private collectors dont allow the people to view their collection. The...
^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: EVERY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'everywhere'?
Suggestion: everywhere
...e museum. Therfore there are fossils in every where and more people can see them. sec...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...ere and more people can see them. secondly, the author mentions that scientists mi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 235, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'investigated'?
Suggestion: investigated
... every fossil that discovered should be investigate by the scientists. Fossils are assessin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 354, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...r that they can be sold by individuals. Therefore the important information of them do no...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.176 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65427654927 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9076188862 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5384615385 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513296139727 0.272083759551 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179516097635 0.0996497079465 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981817200318 0.0662205650399 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308961559675 0.162205337803 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555986400535 0.0443174109184 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.