tpo33
The undeniable instinct of each person is his inclination toward the teamwork. The being a group member is one of the crucial aspects of an individual, and partnership possesses its benefits and disadvantages. While some people are in the conviction that the project assigned by the teacher should be a group project; others, on the other hand, believe otherwise. I absolutely agree with the first belief and will cogently explicate stance on this issue in what follows.
First of all, by the teamwork, students are more likely to learn comprehensively. Indeed, a particular field is examined by various outlooks of team members; as a result, a complete and holistic interpretation of this issue is presented. As the students share and exchange their different perspectives, most valid and full understanding is shaped. A vivid example can be given to shed light on the issue is my own instance. When I was a high school student, as I studied chemistry with the group, I studied the physic lonely. In the chemistry, I gained very deep insight, since I asked my misunderstandings and mistakes from my team members, and they taught that field with the most comprehensible and detailed way. On the contrast, in the physic, I solo memorized the formulas to solve the problems, and as I did not learn the logic relation of the formulas, it was an arduous task for me to pass the physic test. This example lucidly demonstrates how the teamwork is beneficial in the learning process.
The second factor which certifies my idea is that teamwork has another advantage apart from the educational side. In fact, the team works in the school is a proper preparation for the social interaction. Unfortunately, the majority of children are the sole kid in the family, and they do not know how to act in the social community. According to the noteworthy, intelligence survey conducted in my country, approximately sixty-five percent of the children in Iran are the single kid in the family. Moreover, based on another statistic released from the other survey, nearly seventy-nine percent of those children suffer the disability of social interaction. In this chaotic condition, the school team works as a sound solution to overcome this problem. The students learn how to share their thoughts without bothering or neglecting other member's idea.
Nevertheless, some people may assume that the students do not gain their deserved record in the teamwork. However, they underestimate the teacher's capability in the distinguishing the students' abilities. Although, a student can state that the particular ratio of the project is done by his self, the teacher based on the student's progress in the class is able to find out whether he is lying or not?
To wrap it up, all aforementioned reason can lead us to the conclusion that the teamwork in the school is not only helpful in the learning process, but also it is beneficial for social interaction. Therefore, based on what discussed here, I firmly recommend that the project in the school is done in the team rather and lonely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 839, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...s without bothering or neglecting other members idea. Nevertheless, some people m...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 853, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ering or neglecting other members idea. Nevertheless, some people may assume tha...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...amwork. However, they underestimate the teachers capability in the distinguishing the st...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'apart from', 'as to', 'in fact', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.230228471002 0.229887763892 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.142355008787 0.158761421928 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0808435852373 0.0866891130778 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0474516695958 0.046263068375 103% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0509666080844 0.0685040099705 74% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121265377856 0.118717715034 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0351493848858 0.0351676179071 100% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.0091261931 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0193321616872 0.0309702414327 62% => OK
Particles: 0.00351493848858 0.00188951952338 186% => OK
Determiners: 0.149384885764 0.0887237588012 168% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0105448154657 0.0209618222197 50% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.01230228471 0.0139019557991 88% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3073.0 2387.08602151 129% => OK
No of words: 510.0 408.028673835 125% => OK
Chars per words: 6.02549019608 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.48200974243 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.356862745098 0.338922669872 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.288235294118 0.251872472559 114% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.219607843137 0.174417080927 126% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.129411764706 0.112833075102 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0091261931 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511764705882 0.524397521467 98% => OK
Word variations: 61.0854458125 59.2087087015 103% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6684587814 116% => OK
Sentence length: 21.25 20.5533526081 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4439651771 48.84282405 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.041666667 120.699889404 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.5533526081 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.791666666667 0.644075263715 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 50.0735294118 45.7405998639 109% => OK
Elegance: 1.60583941606 1.45489161554 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.300154397459 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.113476102782 0.103427244359 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0745842601448 0.0752933317313 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.569178080327 0.497263757937 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.153785104714 0.151897553556 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.114077575197 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0781384742642 0% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.574825099825 0.336927656856 171% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0194113270374 0.067059652881 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.210909579961 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0618886996521 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.86379928315 233% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 8.42114695341 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 9.0 2.4623655914 366% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.6433691756 139% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.