Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without the shadow of the doubt, research and projects has played a permanent role in education. The calss projects purpose is mostly to help students find new concepts or see the practical application of a concept they already know. I strongly agree with working on projects solo instead of a team. Among myriads reasons, I will delve into the most conspicuous ones to, which persuade me to putforward this idea.
First and foremost, Alveit working in a team reveals different perspectives, coordinating with different people is hard and takes time because in order to work in harmony people need to set meeting which take time and finding a suitable time to set the meeting it self take time. So the project might last more than what it needs to. Fore example, I had a class in the university abou linear programming in which our professor asked us to work on modeling fire department stations across the city. Our team was made up of four people with different classes so we could never find a uitable time to meet with each other in order to decide how to do our research. The project lasted untill the end of the semester even though if I was by myself Icould finish it in two weeks.
Another reason one should take into account is, although individuals can help each other since they have different amount of knowledge, they can get a free ride too but in the end recieve the same scores as others. AN example of this is the time that when I was in the university and studied for my bachelor degree for math, one of the professors asked us to study reasons that caused Microsoft to prosper. During this project I worked with two people whose names were Billy and Ali. To submit an academic paper of our results, me and and Ali worked really hard because Billy did nothing except sitting around and watching us fulfill his resposibilities. But in the end the professor never knew who worked hard and who did nothing at all so he gave us all the same mark.
To warp it up, all aforementioned reasons and examples lead us to the fact that since people might get a free ride and the projects might take longer than expected, it is better to do them solo. Actually there are other reasons and examples advocated the claim that is not mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: IT_SELF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'itself'?
Suggestion: itself
...ding a suitable time to set the meeting it self take time. So the project might last mo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 581, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ifferent classes so we could never find a uitable time to meet with each other in...
^
Line 9, column 532, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...it an academic paper of our results, me and and Ali worked really hard because Billy di...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, really, so, all the same
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5975308642 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44954449884 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558024691358 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.0666665197 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.375 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3125 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2242244645 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720770497939 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384996511231 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129580348292 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0109584960681 0.0645574589148 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.