do you agree or disagree, older people should learn new things like young people do?
Since the begining of the current century, our world has become vey technologicaly advanced. Some people believe that older people have to learn new things like young people do; however, there is a substantial body of evidence that casts doubts on this belief. From a personal perspective, it better for older people to learn new stuffs given that they have a positive impact on their communications, knowledge and daily life.
the first and foremost point, in the last three decades, life has changed drastically because of abundance of innovations, such as the internet. Provided that older people know how to use the internet, they could enhance their communications. For instance, people nowadys could use the internet to communicate with anyone in the world, they could download specific apps, such as WhatsApp and Viber; which is not only comfortable, but also cost-effective. consequently, learning new things is significant.
Next, coupled with proper communications, kowledge is another benefit of learning new materials. when older people know how to use new materials, such as computers , they could not only boarden their knowledge, but also maximize their intelligible capacity. A vivid example, parents who leaen new things, they could take online psycological courses that help them to know mindset of their kids, so they look at various aspects from their perspectives; which help them to engage with thier kids easily. Therefore, having ideas about new things is essential.
One final point, learning new things is very beneficial. if older people learn how to use smart cell phones, they could simplify their life. For example, in the developed countries, such as Canada and the United States people could use data connecting ability, such as GPS to navigate their distinations; moreover, they could use some phone apps, such as Google Maps to know traffic conditions and find out the best routes; which is not only minimize commute time, but also save gas. As a result, new materials coud improve older people's quality of life.
Taking everything into consideration; without doubts, it is crucial for older people to learn new things. It is suggested that advocate for education inorder to continue to progress and develop.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
...belief. From a personal perspective, it better for older people to learn new stuffs gi...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...unications, knowledge and daily life. the first and foremost point, in the last t...
^^^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...y comfortable, but also cost-effective. consequently, learning new things is significant. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...ther benefit of learning new materials. when older people know how to use new materi...
^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... to use new materials, such as computers , they could not only boarden their knowl...
^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...learning new things is very beneficial. if older people learn how to use smart cel...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28491620112 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80214534397 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564245810056 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.792103194 48.9658058833 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.294117647 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0588235294 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299761496855 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120091679419 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114689280395 0.0737576698707 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190924958473 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100945180112 0.0645574589148 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.