Do you agree or disagree that progress is always good Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree that progress is always good? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Nowadays, many people think progress is the most important thing because we always like new products and systems, so we discard old-fashioned things. And if new products are produced, they will be attracted. However, I disagree with this proposal that says progress is always good. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explain in the following essay.

To begin with, progress arises from vanquishing something. When we want to achieve something, we usually struggle with some impediments and find it difficult to make progress from our current status. Therefore, we analyze and find a way to overcome the problem, and then people can see their progress. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. When I was a high school student, I studied hard to go to university, and I struggled with my progress many times. Sometimes, I felt like I was stuck on a treadmill running in the same place. However, one day I realized how to overcome it, and I felt a sense of accomplishment.From this experience, I learned how difficult it is to glow at a constant rate, and I think frequent progress is not always good for humans.

Secondly, human beings have caused many natural disasters due to the progress of technology. People have prioritized effectivity and felt like protagonists on Earth. So we killed many animals and burned a huge number of forests. Even if we did not make any progress at all, we would not cause artificial natural disasters. Of course, progress brings some benefits to medical stages as well as human societies.But, comparatively, human progress destroys our planet. So, progress is not always good. 

In conclusion, many people always think that progress is always good, and we need to progress at a constant rate. However, I think frequent progress does more harm than good for humans and the environment. Therefore, I disagree with the idea that progress is always good. 

Votes
Average: 7 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 641, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: From
...t, and I felt a sense of accomplishment.From this experience, I learned how difficul...
^^^^
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...dical stages as well as human societies.But, comparatively, human progress destroys...
^^^
Line 5, column 498, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...planet. So, progress is not always good.  In conclusion, many people always think ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h the idea that progress is always good. 
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, i feel, i think, in conclusion, of course, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 322.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00621118012 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95806760567 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540372670807 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5856152479 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8421052632 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9473684211 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179643240846 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661160432211 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815787712823 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138009888073 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648385851986 0.0645574589148 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 641, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: From
...t, and I felt a sense of accomplishment.From this experience, I learned how difficul...
^^^^
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...dical stages as well as human societies.But, comparatively, human progress destroys...
^^^
Line 5, column 498, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...planet. So, progress is not always good.  In conclusion, many people always think ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h the idea that progress is always good. 
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, i feel, i think, in conclusion, of course, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 322.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00621118012 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95806760567 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540372670807 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5856152479 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8421052632 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9473684211 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179643240846 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661160432211 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815787712823 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138009888073 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648385851986 0.0645574589148 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.