Do You Agree Or Disagree That Progress Is Always Good Use Specific Reasons And Examples To Support Your Answer

Essay topics:

Do You Agree Or Disagree That Progress Is Always Good? Use Specific Reasons And Examples To Support Your Answer.

Many aspects of our lives rely on how much progress we have achieved in this specific area. While humans have accomplished a great deal of advancement in many fields, they still lag behind in other realms. Generally speaking, the more steps we have taken forward, the better. Hence, I totally agree with the statement that progress is always a good thing for a multitude of reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

To begin with, the majority of individuals would concur with the notion that improving our way of thinking about or doing something engenders a myriad of advantages. Let's take what transpired in the communication industry in the last two centuries. People have developed their communication tools from using birds, such as pigeons, to sending instant messages or even video calling. In the past, the transport of letters took days or oftentimes months since people depended on primitive means, which were also unreliable as their messages could sometimes never reach the destination. In some other cases, the correspondence could be tampered with by other parties who had an interest in doing so. However, nowadays, methods of connecting with other people are much more convenient, more efficient and more secure. You can send a text message and get confirmation for the time it was delivered and also notified whenever the recipient read it and this only reflects how progress in the arena of communication technology has made our lives much easier. All in all, we cannot and should not overlook the benefits we have gained through hard work and achievements in all areas that concern human beings.

Secondly, fields that did not witness much progress in the last two hundred years are the cause behind human suffering. Research areas that require experimentation on human subjects have not seen the same amount of innovation as other areas where no barriers or obstacles for implementing trials existed. For instance, although some small leaps forward have been done in the medical field like the discovery of antibiotics, we still far away from saying that healthcare is on the right track and is moving at a comparable speed like other realms of study. To illustrate more thoroughly, a plethora of diseases today have no known cure and providers only give medicines to relieve symptoms but not to eradicate the cause behind the illness. To be more specific, many kinds of cancers, different types of viruses and organ dysfunction cases perplex scientists and doctors. Had we accomplished more progress in the study of these diseases, we would have saved so many lives and would have avoided many tragedies that come about every single day.

To conclude, yes, it's virtually impossible to offer a detailed answer for an open ended question. Although the jury might be out on this given essay topic, we can come to a mutual agreement that progress is usually good since it provides a host of solutions to any problems in our modern day society.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...thing engenders a myriad of advantages. Lets take what transpired in the communicati...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1044, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...edies that come about every single day. To conclude, yes, its virtually impossib...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...any problems in our modern day society.
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, while, for instance, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2498.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 495.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04646464646 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69529778314 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 292.0 212.727598566 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589898989899 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 781.2 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2416490382 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.9 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.091484547195 0.236089414692 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0267567866202 0.076458572812 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367317251857 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0631833285429 0.150856017488 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334748622452 0.0645574589148 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.