Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Attending a live performance (for example, a play, concert, or sporting event) is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
As everything in life is like a coin that has two sides, people must weigh the pros and cons of every given issue before jumping to conclusions. After all, each and every question or topic requires careful deliberation in that there are different paths to truth. Even though some may adamantly hold that watching plays, concerts or sporting events on television is better than live performance, I strongly believe that such opinion lacks coherence to some extent. In my humble opinion, attending live performance is far better for the reasons I will mention below.
First and foremost, the majority of individuals would agree with the notion that being among other people in a live music show or a game is more interesting than watching the same event on a screen. To clarify, people would have an opportunity to interact with one another during a performance, something that a silver screen does not offer. For instance, folks could talk to each other about what is happening on the stage or in the field. Moreover, some people may be lucky enough to get their favorite player's or artist's attention. For example, when I was at a rock concert for my beloved band, I got into eye contact with my preferred singer and then I started to wave my hand for him and Fortunately he was able to see me in the crowd and waved back. I was so happy and excited afterwards. Furthermore, some die-hard fans like to cheer together for their adored team, something that they cannot do while watching at home. In case of music performance, some attendees like to dance or jump up and down together with the rhythm or beats. Long story short, being at the venue is a totally unique feeling compared to coach-potato experience.
Another point that's worth discussing here is that taking part in a live event is a huge chance to make new friends. To illustrate more thoroughly, like-minded people will probably go to the same events. Therefore, going to the shows you like allows you to get to know new friends who have the same way of thinking and who share the same interests as you. In other words, people who are intrigued by theatre and plays can easily find topics to chat about at a theatre, same thing for individuals who are passionate about sports at stadiums, or music lovers at a concert. All in all, breaking the ice by voicing your opinion about the performance with other people who have the same mind-set will be the first step to form a long-term relationship with them.
To conclude, is attending live events worth it? In my view, yes, absolutely. This is mainly due to the myriad of advantages that I have elaborated above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1084, Rule ID: VERY_UNIQUE[1]
Message: Use simply 'unique'.
Suggestion: unique
...ng story short, being at the venue is a totally unique feeling compared to coach-potato experi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 15, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...-potato experience. Another point thats worth discussing here is that taking pa...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dvantages that I have elaborated above.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, after all, for example, for instance, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2179.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72668112798 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5890331923 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566160520607 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8566468232 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.761904762 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9523809524 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2380952381 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258004954244 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653735183282 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681065145875 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146021067512 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309956401784 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.