Do you agree or disagree with the statement that people who have different interests and personalities cannot be friends.
The tactics of making friends vary from person to person. A bunch of individuals are convinced that friends are supposed to share common interests, otherwise, their friendships will not be long-lasting. However, in my opinion, a friendship can be built without similar hobbies and different interests and characteristics also contribute to a durable friendship and my reasons can be listed as follows.
To begin with, people’s distinguishable interests and personalities are favorable to strike up a conversation when forming a new acquaintance and conversations lay a solid foundation for making pals. To be more specific, there is no denying that the first ice-breaking step of making friends is to communicate. The number one rule of initiating an intriguing conversation is to associate with the one who does not see eye to eye with us on an issue, said by Doctor David Johnson, a psychological expert at Oxford University. According to his research, the opportunities of becoming acquaints with those who differ with us are higher than making friends with those who go along with us. For instance, my friendship with Lucie testifies this conclusion. We knew each other from a debate contest and we barely have nothing in common, but we enjoy talking about an issue with our own style and challenging the ideas provided by the other. but it is the difference that makes us embrace each other as an approach to enlarging our knowledge aspects.
Moreover, genuine friends have nothing to do with common interests and the trust between pals plays a determinant role in sustaining cherished relationships. It is universally acknowledged that true friends are expected to give each other full backing. When an individual is in a jam, the other is willing to give a helping hand. For instance, Indian actor John Don is the best friend of a politician, Douglas. John is reputed for his funny personalities. In contrast, Douglas is labeled as a serious politician. Douglas said when you show your heart to your friends and have a belief in your mutual relationship, you can end with up with a true friend. Hence, the distinctive differences of each other's personalities rarely determine the ending of friends.
Admittedly, individuals sharing similar topics have a higher likelihood of familiarizing themselves with each other. Nevertheless, the same interests do not seem like a permanent element since people change their hobbies frequently, thus maintaining an eternal friendship requires more than common preferences. Here is a case in point. I was familiarized with Emily, my pal, owing to our common interest in reading. Out of my expectation, our friendship easily falls apart because of a single change in the focus of reading.
In a nutshell, considering the availability of starting a conversation among new acquaintances, the secret of being true friends, and the demands of sustaining a long-lasting relationship between friends, I totally disagree with the statement that people with distinctive personalities and interests cannot make friends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: You should probably use 'friend'.
Suggestion: friend
The tactics of making friends vary from person to person. A bunch of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 936, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...enging the ideas provided by the other. but it is the difference that makes us embr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, for instance, in contrast, talking about, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2580.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2868852459 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22975783341 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540983606557 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 792.9 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.5104419538 48.9658058833 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367891785072 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823774813807 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674428744412 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190708016692 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434390455417 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.