Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is difficult for teachers to be both popular ( well-liked ) and effective to help students learning.
Currently, the society has witnessed an unprecedented accumulation of material affluence, thus people are attaching more importance to the education industry, meanwhile the public not only puts considerable emphasis on the fruitful outcomes of schooling but also evaluates the popularity of teachers. Some individuals reckon that with sufficient experience accumulated as education practitioners, teachers are adept at striking a balance between the popularity and the effectiveness of teaching. Personally speaking, I stand on the opposite site and my view can be substantiated as following reasons.
To start with, nowadays, the society is teeming with fierce competition, which imposes escalating strain on students. With the higher standards in passing the college entrance exam or landing a decent job, teachers are craving for improving students’ aptitudes in all round, thus they assign more tasks than ever before. Just as the old saying goes, practice makes perfect. Thus, those education practitioners resort to innumerable assignments at the aim of enhancing students’ academic performance, which results in the ramification that students are burdened with escalating pressure from the excessive assignments and some of them even harbor resentment toward their teachers. The research conducted to evaluate students’ gratification illuminates that 78% of students admit that their teachers’ sternness in pedagogical methods enables them to have a better comprehension of profound knowledge, nevertheless, given the burdensome drudgery and depression they suffer while studying, most of them do not like teachers and cannot maintain a good relationship with their teachers. This research indicates that students, enslaved by a vast number of works assigned by teachers, tend to dislike their teachers.
What’s more, owing to the devotion toward the fruitful outcomes, both teachers and students do not possess sufficient time and energy to maintain sound relationships with each other. With regard to teachers, since they are yearning for students’ better academic performance in examination, they devote all their time and energy toward their pedagogical approaches, for instance, the syllabus, the power points they prepare to utilize in class and so on. Hence, there is no extra time can be allocated to develop relationship with students, which are likely to leave bad impression on students. Apart from that, students, driven by their innate properties of winning, they are also preoccupied with assignments, consequently there is no extra room for them to attach attention to teachers’ charisma, what they care is whether they can finish tasks promptly so as to meet the deadlines or rejuvenate themselves by having a break.
Admittedly, a myriad of experienced teachers are capable of gaining popularity from students with their unparalleled glamour. Nevertheless, since education industry has not been well-developed, students are still be doomed as passive receptacles of predigested knowledge, teachers continue to infuse students knowledge without consideration of students’ sentiment.
In a nutshell, from what has been discussed above, it is burdensome for teachers to be both popular and effective to imparting knowledge to students. For one thing, the intensive competition forces teachers to assign numerous practices which makes students feel overwhelmed. For another, both teachers and students are preoccupied, therefore extra time and energy cannot be committed to develop their teacher-student relationship.
- The best way to increase students’ interest in a subject is to explain to them how this subject can help them in their lives outside the school. 90
- In universities, people tend to concern more about the career prospect of the subjects they learn. Some people propose that students should learn subjects with a fast job growth including math, science, technology, and engineering even if they are interes 90
- The more money people have the more money they should give away to charity 95
- should we tell the mistakes to teachers and when should we tell them 67
- If you are about to enter your final semester and you need to take a final course to graduate, whose course would you like to take?a professor who has taught you in an earlier semestera professor who is new for you 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 871, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... whether they can finish tasks promptly so as to meet the deadlines or rejuvenate themse...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, apart from, as to, for instance, for one thing, to start with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3062.0 1977.66487455 155% => OK
No of words: 520.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88846153846 4.8611393121 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28739523873 2.67179642975 123% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548076923077 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 941.4 618.680645161 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.0801460046 48.9658058833 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.111111111 100.406767564 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8888888889 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.45110844103 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274489879743 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967083970466 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059958103955 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173833104159 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584179404378 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.8 11.7677419355 177% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 58.1214874552 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.1575268817 163% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.47 10.9000537634 160% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.01818996416 127% => OK
difficult_words: 169.0 86.8835125448 195% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 10.002688172 165% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.