Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is difficult for teachers to be both popular ( well-liked ) and effective to help students learning.
There are some moot points about teachers behavior toward students. The question of whether it is tough for a teacher to be popular or effective in learning has aroused as a subject of controversy among academicians. When it comes to my position, with weighing up the pros and the cons, I strongly subscribe to the point that it is not difficult for a teacher to be favorite and strict among students. I have some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be explicated in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is that one of the most remarkable factors for being a popular teacher is effective in learning. When a teacher has high knowledge it helps students to learn very well and get a high grade in their exam consequently, these teachers were favorite among students. As a case to the point, I vividly remember when I was a student in the high school. We had a teacher who was very strict about our assignments and learning thus, this action led to all of us studied very hard and did our homework very well, therefore, we got a high grade in our exam. This teacher due to this behavior was very favorite among whole students. My personal experience competently corroborates to the point that it is not arduous for a teacher to be popular and effective in learning.
By the same token, another paramount reason to mentioned here is that serious teachers have more discipline and this discipline give rise to a regular classroom. A classroom with a tough rule prepares students for every challenge. Due to these tough rule students do everything in the right manner. For instance, they are quite in the time of learning and are joyful in break times. These manners help teachers to attract students to participate in class. My personal example demonstrates this reality when I was a student in the primary school we had a mathematics class which had a regular teacher. He determined some hard rules for whole times of a class. We had a quarter for solving examples and a quarter for questions and answers and a quarter for break and rest. These rules made our classroom very regular and beneficial which led to the average grades of math in that class increase dramatically. My personal example shed some light to the point that it is possible to be a hard and popular teacher.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, I reiterate that, it is possible to be popular and effective teachers if we can enact some strict and regular rules for our classroom. This kind of teachers not only be favorite teachers among students but also have a great impact on their education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...bout teachers behavior toward students. The question of whether it is tough for a teacher to be popular...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, kind of, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2171.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74017467249 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73437511493 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.43231441048 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.9 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4817573603 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6818181818 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68181818182 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277531054548 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949071616313 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652727666312 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188989355013 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152786167582 0.0645574589148 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.