Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own than by people whose views are different from yours.
There are some moot points about people who have a similar or different view from us. The question of whether it is crucial for us to read and watch news presence from people who are a similar view with us or not has aroused as a subject of controversy among individuals. When it comes to my position, with weighing up the pros and the cons, I strongly subscribe to the point that it is important to read or watch news from people who have a different view toward us. I have some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be aptly explicated in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is that the different view leads to a different perspective, therefore, watching or reading something which is different from our view give rise to broaden our vision and ameliorate our knowledge. If we concentrate on the similar horizon it will restrict our view and decrease our rate of success. As a case to the point, I vividly remember when I was a student at the university, I read the journal of civil engineering every month because I was a civil engineer and tend to read only journals in that field. One of our professors suggested us to evaluate all engineering journals because those fortify our horizon toward engineering. After that I decided to check mechanical journal plus civil journal thus, the corollary of that was I could gain much lucrative information about engineering in that journal. My personal experience competently corroborates to the point that it is important to read something which is different from our view.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned here is that different view encounters us with different think and improve our acceptance. To be more specific, in the future life, we will face with too many contradict perspective. Hence, we can have the capacity of admission opponent view which will be very beneficial for future life. My personal example demonstrates this reality when I was a student I choose my friend from top students. I had not any playful friends. My teacher advised me to choose some friends from weak students because it could help me to struggle with various people and increase my experience. This advice was very precious for me because I have some friends now who are not strong in their education but are very eager in the other aspects. These friends boost my ability in another issue. My personal experience shed some light to the point that it is useful for everyone to read and watch and meet various people who have a different view toward them.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, I reiterate that, there are many advantages in reading and watch news presence from people who have a different view toward us, this action not only ameliorate our knowledge but also lead to the encounter with various think and prepare for future life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...ve a similar or different view from us. The question of whether it is crucial for us to read and watch ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 69.0 43.0788530466 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2371.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7995951417 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71175361426 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449392712551 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.9 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6360550317 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.55 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252776649009 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090047578199 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864532581195 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182543154939 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626476475205 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.