Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There are some moot points about human impacts on earth. The question of whether humans' activities have a negative or positive effect has aroused as a subject of controversy among environmental scientist. When it comes to my position, by weighing up the pros and the cons, I strongly subscribe to the point that the earth is being damaged by humans' activities. I have some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be explicated in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is that due to the population increase in each country, nowadays we need more cars, factories, fuels and etc. Thus, these facilities raise air pollution. Needless to say that the more cars need the more fossil fuels and the more fossil fuels lead the more air pollution. As a case to the point, I vividly remember when I was a child there were fewer automobiles than today, therefore, our city was very neater than now. Moreover, this pollution causes so many diseases which are a reciprocity activity. My personal example competently corroborates to the point that human activity is harming the earth, which has a negative aspect on earth and themselves.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned here is that global warming is one of the most significant subjects among academicians. These phenomena stem from mankind's activities which are very drastic for people. My personal experience demonstrates this reality two days ago I watched a program on the BBC channel. In that program, scholar asserts that global warming gives rise to severe drought on the earth which brings critical situations in the water providing and farming.
Last but not least, deforestation is another adverse impact from a human on earth. This action leads to damaging the animals' habitat and ecology. Hence, the decrease in animal's population and has a negative impact on the earth.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, I reiterate that, humans activities are being damaged by the earth. These activities not only lead to global warming and air pollution, but also, change the animals' ecosystem which has an adverse impact on the earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...ot points about human impacts on earth. The question of whether humans activities have a negative or po...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 141, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ays we need more cars, factories, fuels and etc. Thus, these facilities raise air pollut...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 117, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...arth. This action leads to damaging the animals habitat and ecology. Hence, the decreas...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...and air pollution, but also, change the animals ecosystem which has an adverse impact o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06460674157 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76033567456 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544943820225 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7552990172 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8947368421 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7368421053 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05263157895 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222760792662 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735957499701 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736990417226 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134419367731 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554445998264 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.