Nowadays, with the development of science and technology, the overspending of people has begun to increase. The reason for this is people often buy products not because they really need them but because other people have them. Therefore, why do people follow what others buy for? I will tell you two reasons to support my opinion.
To begin with, people get nervous when they do not buy what others buy. People, regardless of age, hate being different from others. Thus, people buy things that others purchase. Even if you do not have these items, you will feel uneasy because you can not communicate with others or feel like you are falling behind. For example, when I was in elementary school, I thought I should buy an iPone that many friends were using.
Next, people believe things that many people use are good things. When we buy something, we usually buy what many people buy. If it is something that a lot of people bought, we think it will be a really good item. For instance, the reason advertisers let Youtubers use a product is to show people that it is used by many people.
This is why people often buy products that many people buy. This seems inevitable. People are a community where psychological factors work, so it can not solve the problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, really, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 52.1666666667 31% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 1977.66487455 53% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 223.0 407.700716846 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70852017937 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.48103885553 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4023656623 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 212.727598566 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565022421525 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 618.680645161 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9510071524 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.625 100.406767564 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9375 20.6045352989 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.499647749218 0.236089414692 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162351260968 0.076458572812 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164781704474 0.0737576698707 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319353784995 0.150856017488 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14710366133 0.0645574589148 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 11.7677419355 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 58.1214874552 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.1575268817 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 86.8835125448 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.