Before tendering my opinion, I think it's crucial to take a quick glance at arguments of both sides. Although many people may hold this view that child's in the past were more creative and side effects of technology is much more than advantages of it, others believe that technology has made a huge progress in making our child's creativity. From where I stand, I concur with the second group who believes technology is a path which if you use it correctly it leads to creativity and further. The reasons behind this viewpoint are discussed in further paragraphs.
First reason coming to my mind consolidating my standpoint is that technology creates an enormous amount of opportunities and it's our job to guild children to take advantages of it. By the light of that, technology give them space to show the creativity of their mind. Technology introduced various brand new fields like programming, and it's obvious now we cant use these fields not even for helping the children but also offer them a comfortable life. For example, we can use video games to increase their creativity.
The second reason which deserves some words here advocating my attitude is that as mentioned before, technology made our lives easier. In safety and welfare children shows more creativity. In this regard, we use technology for the education. Nowadays schools are much more different in contrast to later times. For example, we use computers for teaching like using colorful slides or movies to teach them profound axioms or we taught our child's to use the internet. By the same token, they are exposed to a lot of information which with good guild will help them to become creative and even successful in their adulthood. We learn them how to become successful in college or how to understand deep concepts and further use it to make more creativity in future.
So based on all points mentioned above the advantages of technology is huge.even though its two edge blade but technology made our children more creative and their life easier in contrast to the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'huge progress'.
Suggestion: huge progress
...others believe that technology has made a huge progress in making our childs creativity. From w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 431, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...who believes technology is a path which if you use it correctly it leads to creati...
^^
Line 2, column 127, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...an enormous amount of opportunities and its our job to guild children to take advan...
^^^
Line 2, column 357, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ike programming, and its obvious now we cant use these fields not even for helping t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 750, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... further use it to make more creativity in future. So based on all points mentioned abov...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, for example, i think, in contrast, in contrast to, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 347.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90201729107 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68595935613 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561959654179 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9306210854 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.3125 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6875 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189867185866 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063078099659 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052700984768 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13681289845 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422589716647 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.