Do you agree or disagree technology has made children life less creative than in the past. support your answer with reasons and examples.

Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that children are more clever and creative than they were in the past. we heard a lot from the news resource that some innovation that created by children. This cause not just because of today new networks more covering this news. Because this situation in the past was very rare so surely documented. Contrary to this popular beliefs there are still those who argue that children in the past had not toys and computer games so this limitation in instruments and hobby led to they create something for themselves so it helps to grow of their creative ability. I, to a great extent, disagree with this idea that today children are less creative than the past children.
First and foremost, today, development of science and technology established very strong bases and facility for raising creative ability in children. In recent decade, the high number of research do in this field and exhibited a lot of method and educational program that are using in the schools and academic centers. Now, all of the parents know about the impact of this issue and planning for grow of this ability in their children even before their birth. In the other hand, in the past, a lot of children with special ability in this field never known and most of them suppressed by parents and teachers. Because at this time the educational system was not flexible and did not accept difference.
On another significant fact, that should be taken into the consideration is that intelligence and ability of creativity are at first heritable and in the second level affected by environment. therefore, in this condition, it is reasonable that children today are more creative because they live in the condition that in several ways try to identify and growing of talented children and other children because this ability can be amplify by practice and learning.
Finally, yet importantly, some people explain that less in facilities can stimulate creativity but it is the inconvenience. Because it is clear that presence of more information resources is a very helpful instrument for stimulation of this ability.
On the basis of reasons that mentioned above, I am convinced that today we have more creative children than past time and surely in the future, we observe gain in this cause. because of the discovery of more method and increase of scientific knowledge in this field and availability of more instrument for children. In addition development in genetic science.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...nd creative than they were in the past. we heard a lot from the news resource that...
^^
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y new networks more covering this news. Because this situation in the past was very rar...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 324, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... the schools and academic centers. Now, all of the parents know about the impact of this i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...e second level affected by environment. therefore, in this condition, it is reasonable th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...day we have more creative children than past time and surely in the future, we observe ga...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
... future, we observe gain in this cause. because of the discovery of more method and inc...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ity of more instrument for children. In addition development in genetic science.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, so, still, therefore, in addition, to a great extent

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2073.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00724637681 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71375172259 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490338164251 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.0 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7774889722 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.166666667 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185489899617 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070773707811 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801508350169 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108496868104 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447459770039 0.0645574589148 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.