It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.

Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that if people have this opportunity to work just three days a week, instead of five days a week, they would obtain a higher living standard. Contrary to this popular belief, there are still those who argue that working three days a week but for long hours could create huge work pressure on employees and leads to more stress on them. However, I, to a great extent, agree with this idea that it is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days for shorter hours.

First and foremost, in three days working plan, people would have more free time that can spend it with their family or have more attention to their health. For example, now I just have two days off on the weekend which mainly spend it to finish some undone jobs, study for exams and very few time for setting down with my parent. It is a long time that I could not go to the gym. Nonetheless, in three days plan, I can have some exercise or visit with my nutrition doctor, in order to have a better physical and mental health condition.

Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that in this plan, I will have enough time for travelling. Most of the trips inside or outside of the country are needed more than two days. So through four free days, I can conduct mountain climbing trips which I really interest. However, I am now overwhelmed with busy days, and I do not understand how my days passing one after another.

Finally, yet importantly, in three days plan people will lose lower time on the traffic. For example, my workplace presents out of the city, and I lost four hours just to go back and forth to the work-place. Heavy traffic with air and noise pollution put people health at risk. Every evening, people come back to their house exhausted and nervously. In this way, they are not able to use the rest of the day efficiently. For example, when I back to my home not only cannot study or have nice communication with my family, but also I am usually feeling angry and I want to be alone.

On the basis of reasons that were mentioned above, I am convinced that it is more enjoyable to working merely three days a week for a longer time than a five days job for shorter hours. Because this plan provides more free time for attention to healthy, travelling, and make our living time more efficiently.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
...e undone jobs, study for exams and very few time for setting down with my parent. It is ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, nonetheless, really, so, still, for example, to a great extent

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45067264574 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33335260437 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479820627803 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 617.4 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3940866141 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.473684211 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4736842105 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.537472728527 0.236089414692 228% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155276507343 0.076458572812 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.198047392925 0.0737576698707 269% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307349904207 0.150856017488 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.226628432822 0.0645574589148 351% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.002688172 170% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.