Do you agree or not with the statement that a leader should have strong opinions and not change his/he opinions?
The leader possesses a crucial role in the success of the group. It can be any group such as the school assignment or society. The decision made by the leaders leads to the outcome of the group. While some people are convinced of the idea that leader should own a strong opinion; others, on the other hand, believe that he or she should be flexible. I personally agree with the second belief. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons which persuade me to put forward this perspective.
The first factor which advocates my outlook is that any leader needs the advice of the expertise from the various areas. In fact, as the leader does not have to holistic knowledge about the leading, he or she requires asking for help from the adepts of that particular field. Based on the intelligence statistic released by the Tehran University, nearly seventy percent of the governing issues require the consulting with expertise in the various areas to be able to tackle with the complete issue. On the other hand, if the leader possesses a fixed and concrete opinion, the alteration of his or her thought about the issue will be arduous, as he or she is restricted about the validity of his or her belief. According to the noteworthy survey conducted in my country, approximately sixty-nine percent of the people with the strong and restricted opinion are less welcome toward the changes or adopting the different thought.
The second issue which shapes my idea is that there is always an innovation over the previous view. Indeed, the perspective or opinion are renewed over the period, and the leading is not exceptional from this fact. As a result, if the head of the group is reluctance toward the innovation and is restricted toward his or her old-fashion belief, he or she will cause to the failure of the team. A vivid example can be given to shed light on the issue is my boss's instance. I have a good boss in my job who leads the grocery store. However, he is the fan of his old method and does not welcome the novel method of the selling. Our whole attempts are to impel him to change his thought about the introducing the new products; however, he does not alter it. Thereby we make the lots of losses till the novel product is unknown by the consumers, as they are not distinctive by our boss's old method of advertisement.
Nevertheless, some people may assume that the leader should not present the fluctuation in his or her path. They misunderstand the meaning of the fluctuation. Although he or she should demonstrate the solid progress, this progress should rise rather than fall. This upward process is obvious by the exchanging the ideas and opting the best option, which is accessible by the exchanging the ideas. Otherwise, the concrete downward progress without the variation is the sole drawback rather than the progress to the success.
To wrap it up, based on the aforementioned reasons one can logically draw the conclusion that the leader should not have the strong and unchangeable opinion. As the leader needs the wise advice of the professionals, and there is an innovation and methods are changed by the new and efficient one. All in all, I highly recommend for being the successful leader, it is a wise and sound idea to interact with the team members and ask their idea about the project's goal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 453, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'projects'' or 'project's'?
Suggestion: projects'; project's
...am members and ask their idea about the projects goal.
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'so', 'while', 'as to', 'in fact', 'such as', 'as a result', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.210031347962 0.229887763892 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.14263322884 0.158761421928 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0830721003135 0.0866891130778 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0376175548589 0.046263068375 81% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0673981191223 0.0685040099705 98% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120689655172 0.118717715034 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0344827586207 0.0351676179071 98% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.66648682699 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0203761755486 0.0309702414327 66% => OK
Particles: 0.00156739811912 0.00188951952338 83% => OK
Determiners: 0.15987460815 0.0887237588012 180% => Less determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0203761755486 0.0209618222197 97% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00940438871473 0.0139019557991 68% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3364.0 2387.08602151 141% => OK
No of words: 584.0 408.028673835 143% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7602739726 5.86048508987 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91590194646 4.48200974243 110% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.337328767123 0.338922669872 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.241438356164 0.251872472559 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.16095890411 0.174417080927 92% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.106164383562 0.112833075102 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66648682699 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46404109589 0.524397521467 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 55.9724059554 59.2087087015 95% => OK
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6684587814 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.6296296296 20.5533526081 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8114414389 48.84282405 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.592592593 120.699889404 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6296296296 20.5533526081 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.518518518519 0.644075263715 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 45.7734652461 45.7405998639 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.4746835443 1.45489161554 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295598106816 0.300154397459 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.111982886813 0.103427244359 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0622728287378 0.0752933317313 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.619324948416 0.497263757937 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.132626843509 0.151897553556 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138183961247 0.114077575197 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626467486231 0.0781384742642 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.648426802276 0.336927656856 192% => Paragraphs have same ideas.
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0742742178388 0.067059652881 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234909643313 0.210909579961 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170862689454 0.0618886996521 28% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8870967742 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.91756272401 142% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.6433691756 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.