do you prefer to correct your teacher or leader mistake in front of others or separately?explaiin your aNSWERS with the reasons
We are human and no one is perfect in his life. It is vain to look for someone who doesn't make any mistake in his life. While some people raise an objection to other mistakes in front of a huge crowd of people, others contemplate to rectify them secretly. Whatever the way people choose they should always considerate first by putting themselves in other shoes. If I were asked, I would definitely prefer to wait until the crowd is dispersed and then I pointed towards the mistake. I believe this for two main reasons which I will explore in subsequent paragraphs.
The first reason coming to my mind to elucidate my standpoint is associated with the issue when we criticize someone in front of others, we are lacking empathy that could have serious consequences. It is a well-known expression that thinks before you speak. people should always consider that someone's words could hurt or demotivates others. On the contrary, telling someones about their faults in private provides him the chance to improve and motivate them to work on their weaknesses. My own experience of this is a compelling example. Last year, I was teaching high graders biology at a school. I had done a mistake while lecturing them on amphibians. Suddenly, one of the students pointed me out in front of the whole class. I felt embarrassed as the whole class started to laugh. After that day, I felt like giving up on myself; consequently, I had to quit my job. If He had pointed me out privately, I would not have felt catastrophic.
The second rationale behind my opinion is rooted in the fact that when people point out their superiors alone, it shows their upbringing that they are respectful towards their elders. It expresses the maturity incited in their personalities. Meanwhile, it gives the opportunity for leaders to rectify their mistakes and it leaves a good impression on them. For instance, research in a local university has indicated that when people are informed of their mistakes separately they tend to improve their mistakes more and progress in their lives. Moreover, the relationship between people is flourished too after the incident.
It is clear to see, that rectifying someone in solitary not only prevents people from embarrassment but also provides them the chance of improvements in their life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ife. It is vain to look for someone who doesnt make any mistake in his life. While som...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 259, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...pression that thinks before you speak. people should always consider that someones wo...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... or demotivates others. On the contrary, telling someones about their faults in p...
^^
Line 2, column 573, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'graders'' or 'grader's'?
Suggestion: graders'; grader's
...xample. Last year, I was teaching high graders biology at a school. I had done a mista...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, look, moreover, second, so, then, well, while, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1915.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92287917738 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78569075051 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565552699229 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6545848074 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.2608695652 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9130434783 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86956521739 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104926709387 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0270379080041 0.076458572812 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335318422277 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0566302348398 0.150856017488 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401650140562 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.