do you prefer to have knowledge about a variety of subject or about one specific subject ? and why?
Nowadays, gaining knowledge is crucial for better life. Even though some people may prefer to select one domain and dig deeper in it, I personally prefer to have a global knowledge about different areas of prospective. I feel this way for two different reasons that I will explore in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, having a broad knowledge about different domains not only enables us to have better career in the future, but also can help us getting the desired job. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Back in 2001 when I started my major in pharmacy science, I had to choose three ellective courses in addition to the mandatory pharmacy classes. Although the majority of my fellow students choose their courses in an area that is related directly to our speciality, I selected microeconemy, politic science and sociology as my ellective classes. As a result, when I applied fon internship along with many of my classmates, I could be selected for that position easily based on my expertise in the additional fields. If have not had choose these unrelated subject as ellective courses, I would not have been choosen over my friends to fulfil that post.
Not only this but also, acquiring knowledge about a variety of subject enables as to solve our curiousites in our life, resulting in an lightened vision about contemporary issues. For instance, being a journalist who is curious about gaining knowledge related medical informations, made my father able to really understand how covid 19 pandemic will pose a lot of problems for our society. During the intrviews that he conducted with many doctors on the TV channel that he works for, he demonstrated an outstanding level of control over the discussion.
In conclusion, this can be accentuating by saying that, I personally prefer to to have a comprehensive about different domains rather than sticking to one subjects and go deep in it for the above reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 700, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
... the additional fields. If have not had choose these unrelated subject as ellective co...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 700, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
... the additional fields. If have not had choose these unrelated subject as ellective co...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...r curiousites in our life, resulting in an lightened vision about contemporary iss...
^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...ing by saying that, I personnaly prefer to to have a compehensive about different dom...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, really, so, as to, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02857142857 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88563570536 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590476190476 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5064293757 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.846153846 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 5.45110844103 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241722252242 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839231110477 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999437188499 0.0737576698707 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161559039115 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443205480532 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.