Do you think people in the past were more friendly than they are today?

Essay topics:

Do you think people in the past were more friendly than they are today?

The modern society has witnessed a dramatic variation within the past several decades, which engenders the controversy about its impacts on people's relationship. Some people concern that people living in the current days have been less friendly with the advancement of the whole society. From my perspective, I agree with the statement since it raises valid points.

Admittedly, the vast majority of people may concern that with the advent of various high technology and the increasingly abundant educational resources, people have certainly become more friendly than before. Because they have received complete education with regard to how to be a nice person. For instance, the elementary schools set moral courses as part of compulsory curriculum, which means that people may give priority to the ethic education. Also, children can learn about the significance of harmony and politeness from a myriad of television programs or internet since there are so many videos emphasizing friendly relationship. All of these aforementioned reasons can explain why some people consider that people in modern society are increasingly friendly.

However, I oppose their opinion due to the fact that the moral courses are not closely associated with whether people are friendly. Although numerous schools have attached great significance to moral education, but seldom do people actually pay much attention to it. The examination-oriented education does not allow students to spend much time on learning how to be more polite. Instead, they are appreciated only when they gain perfect academic performance. Besides, the teachers may consider that the students can be taught by their parents about how to behave well, while they neglect the fact that children almost spend a whole day in school so that they have no time to receive family education, thus the fake emphasis on moral education cannot be treat carefully.

Needless to say, social reality has made human relationships more complex than in earlier times. In today's money-oriented world, friendships may be built on the ground of business profits, personal gains, or other hidden agendas. As a result, it is difficult to distinguish between true and fake friendships. People are gradually getting accustomed to such a modern way of making friends. In most cases, as soon as one’s purpose is satisfied, the relationship breaks down. How could a person show pure friendliness to others while wearing a smiling mask?No one is certain whether the real face behind the mask is good or evil. Thus, psychological reactions occur to people all the time, making it impossible for them to express their heartfelt feelings to others. Under this scenario, the emotional world of modern people is no longer as pure and simple as it used to be in the past, thus the smiles and friendliness cannot be seen as the true ones.

Overall, even though people now seem to be more friendly than before, none of us can ensure it is the fact. Conversely, I think people live in the past may even be more sincere.

Votes
Average: 9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ainly become more friendly than before. Because they have received complete education w...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 560, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: No
... to others while wearing a smiling mask?No one is certain whether the real face be...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, conversely, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, for instance, i think, as a result, in most cases, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2571.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 492.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2256097561 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85190560086 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569105691057 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 798.3 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0638144256 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.782608696 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3913043478 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4347826087 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261579789764 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700823181933 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605316636953 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155546593262 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613129896261 0.0645574589148 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.