Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cellphone online games and social networking websites

It is significantly important to understand the new technologies and teach our children how to use them wisely, so that they benefit from technology instead of getting hurt by it. Some people believe that it is difficult to educate children in these days because they play games and use social media a lot, while others disagree with this notion and think that it is easier now to teach kids if we manage to do so in a controlled manner. I am of the latter opinion. I will elaborate on why I feel this way in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, advancement of technologies and different gadgets and devices can be beneficial for the education of young people. Therefore, the education of kids is a lot easier now with these technologies than in the past. Moreover, we can design course materials in a way that is interesting to children, which will lead to a better performance of the kids to learn their courses. Additionally, youth will be reluctant to actually use these interactive media and learn from it instead of the old method of just boring texts on books. For instance, when I was a kid, we used to read books without enough pictures to illustrate concepts effectively and there were no alternative to them as we have now. So, I had difficulties learning materials from just text books without any animations or graphical demonstration. As a result, it is a lot easier to educate children these days by using latest technologies, which is helpful in understanding complex concepts. Had not been utilizing these technologies, kids would not have been understanding complicated concepts.
Last but not least, every technology has some downside if we use it improperly. But instead of avoid using these devices, we can teach our kids to use them properly and have plans for their time. Furthermore, kids are always attracted to something they find fascinating, like online games and different applications. Even in the past, we wanted to play all the time and avoid going to school and doing our homework. Hence, instead of complaining about the difficulties of the new technologies, we should teach our youngsters to organize their stuff and do their studies and education as well as set aside some time for playing games and entertainment. Consequently, we can be sure that our kids can benefit from cell phone and use it wisely to help them in their courses instead of just wasting their times. If kids do not know how to manage their time, they would not be successful in the future and their time will be wasted.
To put it all in a nutshell, taking all the aforementioned reasons into account, I strongly believe that kid's education is easier task than in the past, because not only do new technologies help them understand better, but also we can teach them to use these technologies in a proper way and manage their time.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 884, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'using the latest'.
Suggestion: using the latest
...asier to educate children these days by using latest technologies, which is helpful in under...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1026, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...these technologies, kids would not have been understanding complicated concepts. Last but not lea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 273, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...an teach them to use these technologies in a proper way and manage their time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, i feel, as a result, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2358.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 491.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80244399185 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90253973515 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462321792261 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 739.8 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7058536765 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.9 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.55 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150688478942 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490041650192 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483913050088 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108307266858 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327965876751 0.0645574589148 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.