Essay topics:
Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wait until the class or meeting is
Without any doubt, when something goes wrong in such important things like meeting being frank has both many advantages and disadvantages. Many people contentd that if something mentions uncorrect in a meeting it is better to correct the mistake immidiately. While others asserts that it is better to be calm and wait until other people quit the meeting and after taht we talk to the teacher about the problem. Both opposing arguments have to appear somewhat convincing and stand to point. However, my personal experience and actula observation of life have led me to agree that being frank and correct the wrong mention is a better sollution. In ensuing lines, I delve into two reasons to substantiate my poitnt.
First, there is possible that what have said incorrect is not teacher's purpose and he/she states wrong just because of the stress or careless. If we do not amend the fase talk it may be taught by students in the class. So, by correcting the false talk we can prevent from bad consequences for other students. There is possible that the questions in the exam are related to that lecture. So, if students learn their studies in a wrong way, it will decrease their grades.
Second, in my opinion, in all different situations we must be responsible and do our tasks well. So, as a part of a meeting it is my task to correct the false talk. If we understimate these little things in the society it will lead to disaster. For example,years ago I wasa researcher in a labratoary. one day we have a meeting with our supervisors about a really important matter. In the meeting ur chief said something wrong about the budget and non of us were courage to correct him fault. Our fear were because of bad behavior of our chief. Unfortunately, that mistake lead to catastrophic situation and as a result we waste a lot of our resourses. As you can see, jus by correcting that mistake we can avoid from negative effects.
In a nutshell, correcting wrong things wheather in a meeteing or other situations is vital because of two resons. First, maybe that mistake is just because of careless, second it is our task in our community. By correcting wrong things we can avoid from bad events in our country. I hope someday we do write things in every moments. It is not only useful for individuals but also leads to our social development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 143, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...just because of the stress or careless. If we do not amend the fase talk it may be...
^^
Line 2, column 424, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...re. So, if students learn their studies in a wrong way, it will decrease their grades. Second...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , as” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t be responsible and do our tasks well. So, as a part of a meeting it is my task to co...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t is my task to correct the false talk. If we understimate these little things in ...
^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , years
...ty it will lead to disaster. For example,years ago I wasa researcher in a labratoary. ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
... ago I wasa researcher in a labratoary. one day we have a meeting with our supervis...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, really, second, so, well, while, for example, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69099756691 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7088936477 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506082725061 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1433971939 48.9658058833 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.12 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.44 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.32 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.85842293907 363% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156930158046 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447268488853 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373765481326 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977311627711 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215401963525 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.