The government should give priority to improving healthcare than to solving environmental problem.
Each government implement several policies to improve life condition of their community. Since government budget is so restrictive, therefore, they typically give priority to public policies over others. Then, the question of whether government should give priority to improving healthcare over solving environmental issues has long been a topic of controversy among people, experts and different circles. On the one hand there are people who believe that improving healthcare by constructing hospital and giving advanced medical services will further contribute to have happy and healthy life, and on the other hand others believe that solving environmental issues is more advantageous. As far as I am personally concerned, the latter case carries further weight due to its urgency and interrelation between environment and human life.
Solving environmental issues is utterly an urgent since they are occurring in an alarming rate. Air pollution is now the most serious environmental problem of industrial cities due to the presence of huge amount of cars, industrial companies and other human activities. Deforestation and desertification are increasingly taking place whereby most beautiful vegetation landscape will disappear in just few decades. Oceans, seas and even lakes are becoming contaminated due to human activities using for whether economical or recreational purposes. For instance, a lake in our country become dry due to mismanagement of government whereby not only it causes several people to lose their jobs but also destroy habitat of some particular species. Subsequently, the urgency of solving environmental issues gives it more priority.
Humans depend on the environment in different ways. In fact, we are living in environment, therefore, having health environment leads into having healthier life. For instance, air pollution usually results in a serious respiratory disease such as asthma among children and old people and endanger their healthiness. Furthermore, both human and animal are in relation due to ecological cycles, therefore, destroying animals’ habitat which usually leads to the extinction of those species brings about serious problems for humans. As a matter a fact, human usually utilize meat of some animals as a food or their skin as clothes, hence, decreasing the number of such animals will result in a competitive environment for humans. Consequently, human may become extinct in just few centuries.
Taken all this reasons together, solving environmental issues not only help people to have healthier life but also save the beauty of the landscape and environment for next generation which is our responsibility. Therefore, I think the notion “protecting environmental means protecting our self” is completely true.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...y to public policies over others. Then, the question of whether government should give priority to impr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, then, therefore, for instance, i think, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.0752688172 322% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2379.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71875 4.8611393121 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18112960561 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564903846154 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 761.4 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1681017604 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.210526316 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8947368421 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253754996053 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736566621156 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095662314016 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145971458465 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12044699388 0.0645574589148 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 58.1214874552 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 10.9000537634 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.