if universities are given financial support to develop researches which one do you think would receive more benefits a To predict weather more accurately b To clean rivers and ocean c To deal with outer space

Essay topics:

if universities are given financial support to develop researches, which one do you think would receive more benefits?
a) To predict weather more accurately
b) To clean rivers and ocean
c) To deal with outer space

In university, which research should be given financial support has become a pressing issue. Some people prefer that the university should give more money to weather prediction, some believe that the money should be used to develop new clean methods, while others regard outer space research as a good idea. Personally, among the three projects, I value the clean rivers and ocean the most important project, thus the one that should be given financial support. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

First, no one can deny the importance of rivers and oceans in our society. Human beings cannot live without water, therefore, the quality of water should be regard as the top issue of our lives. On the one hand, the better quality of rivers will develop the quality of the citizens' lives . On the other hand, people now can enjoy the beautiful view and a time of peace by sighting the river.

The second reason that should be considered is that it will not only change human living quality, but also helpful for animals. My experience can be a compelling example of this argument. The main river in my hometown used to be polluted and full of dirty water. Nevertheless, after our government designing new measures to control river pollution and using new clean technology, the clean river that once disappeared for a century now come back to us, it not only change the natural environment of my hometown,but also attracting a lot of animals.
Admittedly, the other two topics are important to some extent. To predict weather more accurately will help us avoid extreme situations, and exploring outer space enables us to search for a bigger world.

In conclusion, based on what has been discussed above, we can safely say that to fund the research of cleaning rivers and ocean will bring more benefits of our lives.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'regarded'?
Suggestion: regarded
...erefore, the quality of water should be regard as the top issue of our lives. On the o...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...evelop the quality of the citizens lives . On the other hand, people now can enjoy...
^^
Line 5, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ollution and using new clean technology, the clean river that once disappeared fo...
^^
Line 5, column 512, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , but
...e the natural environment of my hometown,but also attracting a lot of animals. Admi...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, while, i feel, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 318.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86477987421 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53251572005 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556603773585 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5187207032 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.133333333 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25790460356 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815595665408 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729335056806 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145388750593 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781161720604 0.0645574589148 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.