Barely can a student deny that one of the most crucial factors for selecting a course is its professor characteristic. Following that, what features an excellent professor should have has become a controversial topic of discussion. Although one notion is that a great professor must have outstanding research in his field, to be the best of my knowledge, I subscribe to the theory that a professor which the students like her most would be superior to the one who has an outstanding award for research.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that professor popularity is a sign of students’ satisfaction form the course he teaches. In other words, if students did not have a pleasant experience with the course, the professor would not be famous at all. Besides that, being happy means the students have learned better the materials of the course, and they have been more comfortable with the teacher. As a result, they could have asked pertinent questions without concern whenever they have not understood any part of each lesson. These are the main factor for the professor of the class in which everyone can learn better. Therefore, the more popular a professor is, the better the teacher is.
Moreover, the second noteworthy reason is that being a good researcher is not necessarily means that the professor is an influential lecturer too. Strictly speaking, for being a good teacher various factors get involved. One of these factors is research ability; however, there are some other factors such as how correctly convey the context of lessons to students and how the students can understand what the lecturer tries to teach them, which are more important than being a great researcher. I have to admit that my experience on this matter has profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. During the second year of university, I had two options for my Discrete Events Simulation course, a lovely professor presented one, and another was presented by a famous professor for his recent research. I chose the second one, but unfortunately, things did not go well since the lecturer I choose was terrible at teaching. Therefore, I could not have understood anything from none of the classes I attended. Consequently, I eliminate the course from my schedule that semester. It was foolish of me to do not choose the professor in favor.
Thus, with the above in mind, not only could a popular professor be a better lecturer, but also, having prominent research could not guarantee the quality of teaching. Therefore, it is highly suggested that students choose the well-liked professor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...s a sign of students' satisfaction form the course he teaches. In other words, ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...g happy means the students have learned better the materials of the course, and they h...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...f the class in which everyone can learn better. Therefore, the more popular a professo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, well, in fact, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2178.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04166666667 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86015206268 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502314814815 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3646359376 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282069927748 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908702901158 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783528122669 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192628884128 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859432369238 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.