Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
-Say nothing.
There is no doubt that the right behavior and making the best decision in the critical situations play the prominent role in people's work lives. No one can blind eye to these factors' influence on one's being success. A contriversial question is raised related to the issue is that how should we behave when one teacher or leader in one important meeting says the icorrect things. Some people may hold this viewpoint that we should intrupt and correst the mistake. However, others look this concept from the different lens and believe that we should behave in polite way. In my perspective, the second belief is true and being silent and waiting untill finishing the meeting can be proper in this situation. I will pinpoint some of my outstanding reasons.
One of the most predominant reason coming mind related to the issue is that being polite is necessary for all relations. If we intrupt the meetimg in order to compensate the teacher or leader's mistake, it is a really rude behavior. Take Albert Einistein as an example. He wrote in his biography book that when he had a meeting with some of American Navy's leaders with president of USA, Although one of the senior leaders made a mistake about one physical problem, he was quiet untill finishing the meeting and after that said to the leader his mistake owing to being polite and not bothering anyone. Therefore, saying nothing on that time and waiting untill the meeting is over can be better.
Furthermore, the other equally principal reason supported my idea is that the teachers or leaders probably are the important persons and can be beneficial for us in uor future lives. They can be bothered from this advers behavior. So, in the future, they probably would not help us. From psychological stand point, this behavior will be as a black spot on their mind and would not be earased. Consequently, when they think about us or hear over names that behavior will be memorized for them and will not advocate us. This means that by controling our behavior through the one moment, we can garantee our future lives.
The last but not the least reason is that although being honest and having high selfconfidence are two important feature to be prosper, sometimes we should lye and confirm the one person who say the erroneous things. This is because of situation and our condition that we want to reserve our thriving in the future. Assume Mr Ahmadinejad's athoroties in Iran government. The Athorities always proved the saying of president, although in most of times they were ardjevous. They did this to retain their posessions and garantees their situations in the future. Therefore, being unhonest in some times has many advantagous to our conditions.
From what has been mentioned, we can safely rreach to the conclusion that being silent throuth the meeting and saying the wrong thing to the leaders or teachers after meeting is more beneficial. It is hard to disguise that saying the mistake in that time by intrupting the meeting can show our selfconfidence. Despite of this fact
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 114, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'feature' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'features'.
Suggestion: features
...g high selfconfidence are two important feature to be prosper, sometimes we should lye ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 436, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the times') or simply say ''most times''.
Suggestion: most of the times; most times
...ed the saying of president, although in most of times they were ardjevous. They did this to r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...our selfconfidence. Despite of this fact
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'no doubt']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.197860962567 0.229887763892 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.174688057041 0.158761421928 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0873440285205 0.0866891130778 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0392156862745 0.046263068375 85% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0677361853832 0.0685040099705 99% => OK
Prepositions: 0.119429590018 0.118717715034 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0516934046346 0.0351676179071 147% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.60538014262 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0231729055258 0.0309702414327 75% => OK
Particles: 0.0017825311943 0.00188951952338 94% => OK
Determiners: 0.112299465241 0.0887237588012 127% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0338680926916 0.0209618222197 162% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0124777183601 0.0139019557991 90% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3040.0 2387.08602151 127% => OK
No of words: 519.0 408.028673835 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85741811175 5.86048508987 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.48200974243 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.35838150289 0.338922669872 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.26204238921 0.251872472559 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.169556840077 0.174417080927 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.105973025048 0.112833075102 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60538014262 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487475915222 0.524397521467 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 57.4680588266 59.2087087015 97% => OK
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6684587814 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.2222222222 20.5533526081 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5530518371 48.84282405 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.592592593 120.699889404 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 20.5533526081 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.444444444444 0.644075263715 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 45.4264611432 45.7405998639 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.31012658228 1.45489161554 90% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.547357389205 0.300154397459 182% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0908652611569 0.103427244359 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0601749287735 0.0752933317313 80% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.467330556853 0.497263757937 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.18508327029 0.151897553556 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18813054877 0.114077575197 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1406931437 0.0781384742642 180% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.391954938879 0.336927656856 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0945166295287 0.067059652881 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.403938354813 0.210909579961 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103784209289 0.0618886996521 168% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.86379928315 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.91756272401 224% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.42114695341 71% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.4623655914 244% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.75985663082 217% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.