Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
— Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
— Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
— Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
We live in a society where it is a must for people to behave appropriately with others. For educational and professional reasons, people attend classes and formal seminars. It is crucial to behave in a good manner at those events. In this regard, some people think since teachers and leaders are highly educated professionals and people are attending their classes would like to remain silent. While others hold a different opinion that as a human, anyone can make a mistake and it must need to be corrected at the same time. From my perspective, I would like to wait till the right moment and then speak to them regarding their mistakes. I take the position account for the following reasons.
The first thing that makes me hold the belief that attendees do not know the intention of the speaker. In some scenarios, the speaker might say something intentionally. So, without having a whole idea about the background of the matter while discussing some topics, it would not be a wise idea to speak an opinion loudly in front of the whole class. For instance, when I was a sophomore at university, my biology professor had a habit of intentionally introducing some topics incorrectly, and a reason behind it was that he wanted to check how many students were listening to his class. Hence, it was his trick that he used to check the student’s performance in the class.
Another noteworthy point is that it is not judicious to hamper the flow of the meeting. Sometimes, the mistakes that happened in the class are not directly related to the main topic. Therefore, it is better to ignore those mistakes at that moment and wait till the discussion will get over. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Last week in a Biology lecture, one of the students in my class pointed out a mistake and hindered the flow while the professor was discussing an important topic of human anatomy. Consequently, the speaker failed to complete the topic because all his time was taken in trying to convince the student that his mistake was irrelevant to the topic. Therefore, others had to suffer because of one’s mistake.
Lastly, all the people who attend the lecture need to have dignity and respect towards the speaker. If people think that the speaker makes a mistake then should wait until the lecture gets over, and later, can discuss the mistake with the speaker. Hence, this way professor would not get embarrassed in front of the class. Also, if the mistake is found then the speaker can notify others in the next class or through email.
All in all, contemplating all remarks, I strongly believe that it is wise to keep patience and discuss with the speaker later about the probable mistake. This is because it may disturb the whole class and sometimes students should not raise any doubt without knowing the whole scenario.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, hence, if, lastly, may, regarding, so, then, therefore, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2348.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 490.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79183673469 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61409054697 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483673469388 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 737.1 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2949846096 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.92 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121959508362 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348242455728 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029538272202 0.0737576698707 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0646544243582 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265831356114 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.