The reading and the lecture are contradicting each other, in terms of validation of James Austen’s picture. To be more specific, the penman of the article provides three theories support that the girl they found in the potrait is james Austen. However, the lecturer casts on doubt about the claim and mentioned in the article and refutes three theories. Also, she, herself represents provides three solutions to this issue.
According to the article, the first duspute focuses on the fact that it was her own family who recognized her face in the potrait and gave the permission to use her face with her letters which clearly illustrates that she was Austen herself. Nonetheless, the lecturer undemines this idea by asseting that the family was came into the light 70 years after Austen' death and in reality, they have never seen her in their life. In fact, it was all about assumption that thay have made about the girl in the picture. Thus this theory is not acceptable.
Moreover, another topic of debate highlights that the facial features of the girl in the picture looks merely similar to the girl in Cassandra's sketch who is her sister, and thereby, people start believing that that is girl Austen. Nevertheless, the professor refutes this argument by asserting that it is very likely that the girl can be one of her close relatives since he had quite extended families. Also, many people assum that the girl could be one of her nieces named Marry and Campion. Hence, this point is also not convincing.
Lastly, but importantly, this potrait was painted by famous artist Humphrey who might be hired by the austing family to make her potrait. Moreover, he had been active during the time when Austen was very young and her age totally matched with the age of a girl in the potrait. On the contrary, the professor rejects this theory and contend that the stamp on the canvas has a name of willium who did not sell canvas during the era when Humphrey was working, rather he used to sell it when Austen was twenty-seven years old.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...is idea by asseting that the family was came into the light 70 years after Austen de...
^^^^
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ave made about the girl in the picture. Thus this theory is not acceptable. Moreo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, lastly, look, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, thus, in fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 22.412803532 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 354.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78248587571 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40855780314 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519774011299 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7965213535 49.2860985944 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.866666667 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124637552851 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419591856871 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297062750885 0.0662205650399 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0748078247552 0.162205337803 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240368770269 0.0443174109184 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.