Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting is over

Essay topics:

Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
•Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

It goes without saying that there are a lot of mistakes during presenting a lecture or anything else. There has been a controversial debate among people having different idea from others as to what way is appropriate to inform people from their misconceptions. From my perspective, waiting until the end of the class or meeting is a beneficial way, and two reasons to support my view are elaborated upon under here.

To begin with, waiting to talk upon an incorrect concept, we are able to respect one's presentation. It is not a secret to anyone that humans usually do not like to be criticized by others since they feel frustrated, so stating our opinion which opposes the persons' idea may have some unintended consequences such as weakening persons' confident, which is the main characteristic of every successful individual. To put it in more vivid picture, when I was a university student, I had a more outgoing personality and a good confidence about myself; unfortunately, having presented an important topic in front of all student, I have turned into introvert girl since one of my classmate states his opinion that was against mine. Had he waited until the end of my presentation and talked to me in person, I would not feel so bad about myself since he would not have a chance to humiliating me. As you can see, waiting until the end is helpful since speakers do not feel inferior.

Furthermore, doing this, waiting until the end of the presentations, we are more likely to convince the person to accept our opinion. It is crystal clear that we all want other people to agree with our point of views or beliefs since it is our nature to feel connected with other members of society in this way. Waiting to talk in person with speakers, we have an opportunity to highlight our thoughts because they will understand that it is thoughtfulness of us to wait until they complete their presentation. Making the first good impression, we are able to convince them they have wrong information or ideas, so they can escape from the clutches of shame and feel better. Besides, they have more time to defend their theory or idea and when they do not find any reasonable answer, they will accept that they had a misconception. As you can see, it is more likely to convince them that they are wrong.

In sum, not only will they feel better about themselves, they will also be more likely to accept our opinions since they have more time to think about.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...correct concept, we are able to respect ones presentation. It is not a secret to any...
^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...o stating our opinion which opposes the persons idea may have some unintended consequen...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, if, may, so, as to, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2030.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72093023256 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77205400316 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502325581395 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.7795118175 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.333333333 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 20.6045352989 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103670188818 0.236089414692 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452287943377 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413118534398 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0643440340771 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346263989207 0.0645574589148 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.