It is crystal clear that, people may commit mistake in their performance, life, lecture and so forth. The teacher or meeting leaders , like another people, may have a mistake in class or meeting. Many times, their student or guest realize their flaws. What should they do? Is it sensible to interrupt and correct the mistake immediately or say nothing? I, for one, believe that sane person should wait until the meeting and class ends and then share his point of view with teacher or meeting leader. I hold this view, on account of three conspicuous reasons which elaborated hereunder:
First and foremost, By doing in this way, you will reveal your respect toward that person. Probably, pointing out the virtues and flaws of individuals in public will cause annoyance. On the other side, in face- to- face communication, you are talking privately and no one will aware of the issue which is being exchanged. Furthermore, by mentioning other person's mistakes, other audience in the meeting or students in classroom will misunderstand your intention, They will consider the critics as jealous person and consider you as a biased person who believes merely his point of views, although your statement is correct and wise. So, to hamper this misperception, it is rational to remind the teacher and meeting leader's mistakes, face to face.
Additionally, interruption of the teacher statement to mention his/her faults will lead to the other mistakes. In this condition, breaking in one's speech will act analogous to distraction. So the aforementioned person will sidetrack and in so doing, he/she will commit other mistakes. Although, the critic intention in nothing except, aiding the mentioned person.
Last but not least, Saying nothing is not sensible. It is possible that, other person in classroom or meeting is cognizant of the fact that teacher or meeting holder's mistakes. Therefore, He will presume that you are ignorant of mistakes and draw a false conclusion about your knowledge. With this in mind, and considering the personality and social statues of mistaken one, it is better to talk that person after meeting or class.
In a nutshell, Although, in some situation, it is very though to talk about other's fault. But in order to prevent repetition of that mistake, we should remind him, his mistake. I, myself, believe , it is wise to talk with him or her in person after class or ,meeting for the reasons stated above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...so forth. The teacher or meeting leaders , like another people, may have a mistake...
^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...istakes. In this condition, breaking in ones speech will act analogous to distractio...
^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ind him, his mistake. I, myself, believe , it is wise to talk with him or her in p...
^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...with him or her in person after class or ,meeting for the reasons stated above.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, then, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 13.8261648746 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2033.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05721393035 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69808225016 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537313432836 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4301734819 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4090909091 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.40909090909 5.45110844103 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240954321598 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736614043842 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752289063779 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139361182411 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955698813016 0.0645574589148 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.