Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect.
In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader
-Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is indeed undeniable that life has many ups and downs and human beings should deal with them in a right way. Although the teachers and leaders are imagined as knowledgeable persons, they might unintentionally make mistakes. People often divided by the idea either they should not destroy a teacher or leaders prestige in a class or meeting and they should say nothing or correcting the mistakes immediately is the best approach. Regarding this controversial issue, I believe correcting the mistakes of a teacher or a meeting leader is of a paramount importance.
On this account, being silent and telling nothing when we know a teacher is making a mistake is unfair because others will get wrong information. One who recognizes the mistake can ask questions in a polite way in order to make the teacher conscious. Asking questions not only will make the teacher aware of the mistake, but also will inform other students. Take my own experience as an example, when I was in the high school, our math teacher made a mistake in calculating the numbers. I myself calculate the numbers again and found out that she made a mistake. I raised my hand and asked a question about the incorrect part. Our teacher realized that she made a mistake and appreciated my attention. It indicates that people should feel responsible for correcting any mistakes.
Likewise, nowadays companies are competing with one another to be successful and having more benefits. If employees do not correct the decisions of the manager, the company on the whole will experience a bad situation. As an example, two years ago I was working in a computer producing company. In a meeting, one of the employees recommended that we should give the computers a new design in order to increase selling and attracting new consumers. The manager rejected the suggestion because he thought other companies are producing computers with old designs too and it will cause unnecessary costs. The employees were aware of that the other companies are planning to make new designs but they did not tell the manager. As soon as the other companies produced their computers with new designs, our company missed a great deal of consumers. Correcting the manager’s mistakes can benefit all of members of a company.
In conclusion, I personally tend to go along with the idea that interrupting and correcting the mistakes of a teacher or a meeting leader will cause a positive result. No one can deny the fact that without doing mistakes gaining valuable experiences is inaccessible. It is hoped that by accepting faults both sides will attain valuable achievements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a right way" with adverb for "right"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... and human beings should deal with them in a right way. Although the teachers and leaders are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 195, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a polite way" with adverb for "polite"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ecognizes the mistake can ask questions in a polite way in order to make the teacher conscious....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, regarding, so, in conclusion, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2188.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00686498856 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89991035597 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517162471396 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.096992755 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1304347826 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.91304347826 5.45110844103 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186539729051 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531722745517 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612641730816 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127002542236 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762486337966 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.