Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade
-Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nobody is perfect and people sometimes make mistakes when they speak in front of others, and it is crucial to point out to the errors. However, I personally think that any correction should be done in a private environment, especially if the speaker is a teacher or a leader of a group. There are a few reasons why I hold this opinion.
First of all, talking to a boss about his mistake afterward is the most polite way of correcting him. If a subordinate corrects a chief in front of other workers, it can harm his career since the leader may consider such an attitude offensive. My brothers experience is a compelling example of this. When during one meeting, my sibling told his manager about an inaccuracy in a monthly report made by the boss, the manager felt embarrassed. As a result, every day after this incident, the manager was looking for a reason to embarrass my brother in front of colleagues until my sibling finally quit the job. That is why it is better to correct a leader when nobody else can hear.
Secondly, interruption during a meeting can negatively affect the results of the gathering. If someone starts talking about an error made by a meeting leader right away, the discussion can turn to a different direction and the questions, which supposed to be discussed can be left behind. For instance, in my pharmacy, we have limited time for the staff briefings and during this time span, we have to talk about really important for our work routine thing, such as about ways to serve our patients in the best way. If someone on the team interrupts our supervisor when she speaks, it causes unexpected discussions. In fact, we lose the precious time and eventually do not talk over truly significant topics. In this way, the effectiveness of the meetings suffers.
To conclude, I strongly believe that it is pivotal to correct a leader when an assembly is over. This is because it helps to maintain positive relationships with the supervisor and increases the effectiveness of the huddle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reases the effectiveness of the huddle.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, look, may, really, second, secondly, so, for instance, in fact, such as, talking about, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75142857143 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77293773343 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568571428571 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.531942893 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8235294118 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5882352941 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35294117647 5.45110844103 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157261437453 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486007352664 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340454172986 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826965707613 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314254475838 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.