Being in classroom and having contribution in class is an important factor since many teachers give some grade for this activity for final score and pay more attention to this issue. However some teachers do not like any interruption during the lesson and permit students to talk at the end of this time. I prefer to say my opinion right away and not to wait that class would be over.
First of all, recant researches indicate one of the most effective elements in improving teaching quality is how much students are active. These projects show persons learn better when they interact with educator since many schools and universities design their lectures similar to workshop. So in new methods of educating people have permission to talk easily whenever they want and have conversation or even challenge lecturer. For example in my master degree program we can reject any opinion provided and deny many issues in our courses without any fear as far as we would be rewarded for this character.
Secondly, saying our opinion promptly when we find it is not correct help to stick that subject in mind very strongly in comparison with the time we wait for class ending. It is a psychological fact that learning process will be more valuable when there is conversation between participants. For instance, people remember the things have been discussed and if you want mention a topic it will be proper to first remind the discussion more than the topic.
Finally, correcting a teacher is not very undesirable and in contradiction it is a respect to the speaker when you participate because it shows you are listening to him or her. People gets excited when they see somebody care about their concepts and pay attention to them. For example imagine you talk with a friend and he does not any response to your talks and compare that with a situation a friend even disagree with you and even oppose interestingly.
In conclusion, like any issue in the world there are many negative and positive comments about correction during someone’s talking or how it is rude to say teacher is wrong. But recent approaches in training prove all student should accompany with the classroom by trying to declare their beliefs.
- Fossil fuels are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy have been encouraged to be used by some countries.To what extent is this a positive or negative development? 89
- Do you agree or disagree? One can learn a lot about another people from the books and movies that he likes 70
- Before making a decision it is important to find out if the decision will be popular with others 90
- TPO-21 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 70
- living in alarge city or a small town. 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
...e and pay more attention to this issue. However some teachers do not like any interrupt...
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
...ts in improving teaching quality is how much students are active. These projects sho...
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...tive. These projects show persons learn better when they interact with educator since ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92021276596 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66372017312 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579787234043 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.2225593852 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0666666667 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148154251702 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512751873987 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565681546137 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849366317491 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491331050103 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.