Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
•Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without any shadow of doubts, having interaction with others in the society is one of the most pominent needs and treends which is embedded in people's spirit. A controversioal question is whether it is adequate to try to correct speaker's mistakes imideatly or it is reasonable to ignore it. I do subscribe to the conviction that it is better to waint until the end of the class or meeting then by using tact explain the mistake to them. To support my stance, in the course of this essay, I will aptly substantite my viewpoints.
To begin with, interuping the speech to corect the mistake is not desirable behavour, even in some countries this is noy only too impolite, but also agaist their culture. Were we realistic enough we would admit that a decent person or student should take advantage of use of tact, if he or she wants to clear the vague idea, especialy in the community. According to the psychological view, every individual has his or her own veiwpoint regarding the behavior in this situation; thus, it is to logical to respect their aideas and have rational treatment towards this issue.
Another reason which deserves to say some words here is that, all aforementioned reasons in the previous paragraph do not mean that ingnoring the vague idea is better chioce, whereas turing into the ambigious word delebratly will provide the opportunity to share variety consepts about the given point. It is controvertibly axiomatic that if there is not any attempt to correct any misunderstanding idea, the vague idea would be spread among the vast majority of people or students in galloping rate. For examle, imagine a teacher who gives an incorrect information about a sophisticated topic in science intentionally or actidantly, if a student does not mention this erroneous data to him or her, how the teacher can expect the students would be prosperous in their future job by utilizing these incorret information?
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that it is better to try correct any mistake consept politly. Since the benefits of this viewpoint hold sway to its diadvantages, I strongly advocate waiting until the end of the speech then politly try to clarify the misunderstanding.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Without any shadow of doubts, having int...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill aptly substantite my viewpoints. To begin with, interuping the speech to ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rson or student should take advantage of use of tact, if he or she wants to clear...
^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: TO_TOO[5]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...behavior in this situation; thus, it is to logical to respect their aideas and hav...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tional treatment towards this issue. Another reason which deserves to say som...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tilizing these incorret information? In brief, contemplating all the aforemen...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, then, thus, whereas, in brief, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01340482574 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96397884558 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605898123324 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.437308034 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.833333333 100.406767564 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0833333333 20.6045352989 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122743339044 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421125685905 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456669152891 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0704651410398 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413862431716 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 11.7677419355 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 58.1214874552 69% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.