To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors.
No one can ignore the important rule of professors in the education system. Without the professors there were be no students. Although I understand that professor has a vital rule in the quality of education. I have a different opinion. To improve the quality of the education system we have to spend money on more necessities like libraries and dorms or even cafeteria. The basis of my opinion is educational, social and personal.
Educationally, students need access to the internet and they need more text books.
Students in the universities are assigned to do many projects and paper work. The best place to get all the essential information is from libraries. Students also need a quite place to concentrate and focus, libraries is the favorable for most of them. To improve the quality of education we should spend more money on building more libraries on the universities or even supply the library with the best sources of information, and computer systems. That way we could have better students and consequently better education.
Socially, universities should spend some of their money on building of cafeterias. It is more convenient to have more than one cafeteria in the campus. For instance, I remember when I was in the college there was only one cafeteria and I should walked for about 15 minutes to get my coffee, I felt exhausted and tired, so many times. I did not drink coffee or even I could find a place to relax, I would not be able to focus and concentrate the rest of the day, which affect my quality of education, However if there are more than one cafeteria it will provide the chance to students to relax and communicate. Students will use their break and lunch time to eat food and drink something, they still have long day of learning. That way, students don’t have to waste their time going off campus searching for restaurant or other coffee shop to eat
In conclusion for the reason I mention above, I encourage the all universities to use the money on other important necessities than increase the professor salaries. Having library is the good source for improving the quality of education. Cafeteria is another souse to help students get relaxed and continue their education process.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...stem. Without the professors there were be no students. Although I understand that...
^^
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e professors there were be no students. Although I understand that professor has a vital...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erent opinion. To improve the quality of the education system we have to spend mo...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is educational, social and personal. Educationally, students need access to t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('quite') instead an adjective, or a noun ('place') instead of another adjective.
...n is from libraries. Students also need a quite place to concentrate and focus, libraries is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 536, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'cafeterias'?
Suggestion: cafeterias
...ion, However if there are more than one cafeteria it will provide the chance to students ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, so, still, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1864.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91820580475 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80413245896 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480211081794 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.8571936167 48.9658058833 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.95 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225086979108 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705408489109 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972025770857 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126929921145 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737459371231 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.