Undoubtedly, one of the most essential problems which decision-makers of each university face with, is how to allocate their limited budget to various regions in order to improve the quality of education as the best and most efficient way. When it comes to this point, many of these decision-makers want to know whether increasing salaries of professors leads to the purpose or not. Although, many researchers repudiate the increase of salaries, I personally concur with it. In what follows, I will delve into couple of reasons to shed light on my response.
First reason that comes into my mind is that by this strategy universities can hire more expert professors. In general, professors are known by their specific methods during their teaching, known as teaching methods. The most efficient teaching methods have not been founded by less experienced professors, owing to the fact that each of these methods needs spending time on debugging its errors. Although the expert professors have allocated their teaching time since their very first moments of teaching, the required budget for hiring them is extremely high, but if any university's decision-maker wants to have better and more expert professors regarding better educational system, s/he should concur this huge expense. "Parreto" principle in Finance, says that eighty percent of each result is directly related to twenty percent of whole budget for occurring that result. It can be expanded to this special reason. Based on this principle, eighty percent of limited budget of a university should be allocated to twenty percent of the number of that university's professors, in order to have the best results. Thus, increasing the salaries is not as destructive as some critics explain.
Second, should universities spend more money on salaries regarding improving the quality of education, professors would have better performances. Usually, each person considers his/her salary, when s/he wants to either accept or reject a job. If each person has a low salary, s/he would not be concerned about getting fired, owing to the fact that the opportunity cost of his/her job is very low. Never have teachers and professors been separated from this group. Thus, professors would change their performances, if their salaries would be increased by universities' decision-makers. As I remember, having entered to my new university, I faced with a high increase in professors' salaries. Their behavior and performance during classes were really changed. They had known that we had to write surveys about them at the final exams, and the university's manager will read them in order to investigate the effects of salaries' increases, so, they paid much more attention to our educational problems to get better feedbacks, and were prevented from being in risk of getting fired. As a result, that semester my classmates and I had one of our most high grades ever.
To recapitulate, we can conclude that one of the most efficient ways regarding educational improvements is spending more money on university professors. It is because the more the salaries, the more the best teaching methods used by professors, and the more the better performances provided by them. I strongly propose that salaries of the professors should be increased enough to keeping them more satisfied.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, really, regarding, second, so, thus, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2811.0 1977.66487455 142% => OK
No of words: 531.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29378531073 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96559885733 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472693032015 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 870.3 618.680645161 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.0994999201 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.125 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31269758464 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870863325451 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121647912279 0.0737576698707 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208422811034 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913918782961 0.0645574589148 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.