To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Universities play an important and vital role in the education system. Most of the universities try and compete to increase their rank among others. There are lots of ways to improve the
quality of education. The most important question regarding this is that if the education quality will be more effective by increasing the salaries of professors or not. From my point of view,
I assert that the university should increase the professor's salary and in what follows I will attempt to address the most discernible reasons.
First, professors will be more enthusiastic to do their job if the amount of money increases. Albeit, the money is not the most important part of education but It can solve most of the professor's problem; The differences between professors in different university in my country is a good example of this. Accordingly, in my country 'IRAN', professors who serves their job in governmental university such as "Sharif university " make more budget while those of in private university have less income. According to a new research, the professors of governmental universities assign more time to their students and this helped the education to be more effective in that area. That research taught me that money can increase the level of quality in universities.
In addition, professors work fewer hours during the week. According to this, common working hours each week are 40 hours which can be a negative point, but if they make more money the office hours will be reduced to less than 30 hours which will result in higher quality in education. For example, during the time that I was in a master's, a new role raised the professor's salary and attenuate their weekly work hours; Afterward, the professors spend more time on students by solving more problems. Based on the university, that change increases the grade of the student which has a direct correlation to the quality of education.
Finally, professors will have more time to work on articles. This is an important point in the level of education in the country. For instance, the country that publishes more articles in authentic journals will have a higher rank in-universe. Nonetheless, there are some conferences and less important journals that may not count as efficient as authentic ones are. Also, in each year, five topmost countries would take the prize with the help of a creative method and this is the best epitome of education quality which defines as the production of science.
All in all, as the aforementioned examples have illustrated, professors should have more salary that helps education to have more quality. Not only the professor will have more enthusiasm but also it decreases work hours and helps professors to participate in a publication. Therefore, I think that the university should increase the income of professors for better quality in education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...cation system. Most of the universities try and compete to increase their rank among ot...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...that the university should increase the professors salary and in what follows I will attem...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 186, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
... education but It can solve most of the professors problem; The differences between profes...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a master' or simply 'masters'?
Suggestion: a master; masters
... example, during the time that I was in a masters, a new role raised the professors salar...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...was in a masters, a new role raised the professors salary and attenuate their weekly work ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, first, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2407.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.088794926 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88031052016 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.439746300211 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 770.4 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0738131883 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.409090909 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.40909090909 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.53405017921 154% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.457608711943 0.236089414692 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136174610467 0.076458572812 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781591844893 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230480748467 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784749604235 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.