Every one takes a trip for different reasons, consciously or unconsciously. However, many people do not consider the benefit of either going on trips individualy or taking group tours with guides. This is because most people have not tried out both options, not to talk of choosing the best option. If many people considered the benefits of each option, there would be a popular opinion. However, for two reasons, I feel it is better to take group tours with guide.
First, there is a higher probability that safety is ensured on group tours with guides. When you take tours with guides, you are forewarned about inherent dangers of the journey, hence safety is ensured. For instance, a friend of mine travelled to a tourist cattle ranch in Northern Nigeria, two years ago. She was not aware that the temperature of the ranch was so hot that she was meant to take a liter of water every thirty minutes. On getting to the ranch, she became dehydrated because she had no water left in her car, and drinkable water was not being sold around. As a result, she fainted, and had to be revived by a good samaritan who happened to be a medical practitioner. On the contrary, my friends and I took a trip to the highest hill in the country last year with a tour guide. We were able to survive the cold temperature without casualties because we were forewarned, and prepared adequately. As you can see, it is clear that it is better to travel in groups with a guide, to ensure safety.
Second, it is more fun filled to travel in groups with tour guides than doing otherwise. Traveling with guides exposes one to exiting experiences stories about both the destination and routes to the destination. For example, I have visited the Olumo rock touris center in Abeokuta, Nigeria twice. The first time I visted, I went alone. I would say that I had fun, but in a very minimal amount, compared to my experience the second time, when I went in a group, with a tour guide. On my second visit, the tour guide my friends and I stories about each item that was found around the rock. In fact I was able to learn a lot about the origin of the Abeokuta town and its people. Besides, my friends and I played a couple of exciting games which I did not have an opportunity to play on my first visit. After the second visit, I felt I wasted my money during my first visit. Hence, it is obvious that taking a group with a guide is much better than goin on a trip by oneself, as one gets to have fun and learn much more than the other scenario.
In sum it is better to take a group tour with a guide on a trip that to do the contrary. This will ensure that the time is adequately maximized for learning and having fun. Also, safety guarantee is higher when one travels in groups with tour guide. It therefore, is not an hype to say that traveling with a tour guide in a group is the best option.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etter to take group tours with guide. First, there is a higher probability tha...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ups with a guide, to ensure safety. Second, it is more fun filled to travel ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... much more than the other scenario. In sum it is better to take a group tour...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 277, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...s with tour guide. It therefore, is not an hype to say that traveling with a tour ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i feel, in fact, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2342.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 533.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39399624765 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43063356795 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.0 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6306924986 48.9658058833 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.6428571429 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0357142857 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431483757927 0.236089414692 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12167524572 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144194183479 0.0737576698707 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284757718894 0.150856017488 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820915667698 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 10.9000537634 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.