It is better to make friends who are intelligent than with a good sense of humor.
As social and technological advances develop these days, people have many opportunities to meet many people. They can meet people of various personalities as you network with them. Which is better between clever and humorous friends. Some people think that smart friends are more helpful for people. However, funny friends have more positive benefits than intelligence because people can relieve their stress, improve their relationships, and learn many things from them.
First of all, people can get rid of their stress. This is because since humorous friends can say many fun jokes when people get stress due to efforts to survive in this competitive society, friends can encourage them with enjoyable jokes. However, intelligent friends usually tend to point out people’s weaknesses, which is not good for people’s mental health rather than assisting them. For example, in my case, one of my past friends have many knowledge but not the sense of funniness. When I talked to him about my agony, he always criticized my fault. However, other buffo friends say funny jokes or introduced me to show memes for relaxing my stress.
Second, people can deepen their relationships with funny friends. Humorous friends usually have many topics to continue communications. For example, when I chat with my funny friend, I usually converse 1 hour. This is because, at the end of a conversation, he changes instantaneously topics, and the topics are not boring, so, we can easily maintain a lasting talking. However, my other smart friends choose very academic and professional topics that most of I cannot understand or feel tired. Then, our talking time typically cannot over 5 minutes.
Finally, people can learn many things from funny friends. This is because they can already understand about people’s strengths and drawbacks. Many scientists already prove that humorous people have higher IQ (intelligence quotient) than intellectual people. Also, due to their characteristics, they have a lot of friends, so, people can learn how to socialize by modeling them. According to a survey done by KIS, 60% of the respondents said that they learn social skills from their friends. They explained that their funny friends easily get along with other people who they first meet.
In conclusion, humorous friends are more beneficial that intelligence. This is because people can reduce their stress by funny jokes. Also, people can thicken their relationships with their friends due to ceaseless communications. Lastly, people can learn social skills, and be helped for being better people by their friends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 442, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...in my case, one of my past friends have many knowledge but not the sense of funnines...
^^^^
Line 2, column 442, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[2]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun knowledge seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much knowledge', 'a good deal of knowledge'.
Suggestion: much knowledge; a good deal of knowledge
...in my case, one of my past friends have many knowledge but not the sense of funniness. When I ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r being better people by their friends.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, lastly, second, so, then, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2193.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30992736077 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77060220825 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486682808717 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.9 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0272209214 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.2222222222 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2962962963 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 11.8709677419 194% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194991760469 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624834634533 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584727673262 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124298359075 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276593400519 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.