it is better for students to understand ideas and concepts rather than learning facts
The material discusses the causes of the strange sound called quackers. While the reading looks ate the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding this topic, namely orca whales could make this odd voice. Next, this strange sound could be caused by giant squids. Finally, a secret submarine of another country could generate this sound.
Conversely, the lecture challenges the points, one specific contradiction is, it is true that orca whales could cause specific sound, but they usually live near the surface. However, submarines are deep in the ocean, so it is very hard to hear them. In addition to that, Russian submarines heard this sound in 1960, but it disappeared in 1980; on the other hand, giant squids still live there, so if they were the reason for this sound, this sound should continue till now. One final point, this sound moved with high speed and with changeable directions; however, submarines could not change their directions; moreover, with advanced technology today they could not move fast. As a result, quackers could not be caused by secret submarines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 743, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld not be caused by secret submarines.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, still, while, in addition, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 52.1666666667 35% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 1977.66487455 51% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 192.0 407.700716846 47% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25520833333 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 4.48103885553 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46397657366 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 212.727598566 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635416666667 0.524837075471 121% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 618.680645161 47% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5965869313 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.9 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.5 5.45110844103 284% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.00833021832385 0.236089414692 4% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00254858233243 0.076458572812 3% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0076457469973 0.0737576698707 10% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00419144707621 0.150856017488 3% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00592760130114 0.0645574589148 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 86.8835125448 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.