It has been said, “Not everything that is learned is contained in books.” Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why?
Knowledge is the power from the very starting point of human society. In any society and country knowledge is the pre-requirement for the sustainable development such as, leadership buildup, scientific development, to shape a pragmatic human mind. The grain of knowledge is obtainable from either books reading or experiencing life phenomena is a matter of debate, some would like to agree books reading, others would be support only experiencing life. If anyone asked me to choose in between two options, I would obviously choose the later options because of the following two important reasons.
The main reason is that knowledge acquiring from life is more adaptable and plastic to learning. In our daily lives we are facing many odds as well as good experience. From these we decide what we should do and what we shouldn’t do. These things ultimately make us a pragmatic individual. For example, when I was reading in class nine, I have gone through a reading passage, named “How to learn a bicycle”. In this context a student has gone through two ways to learn the bicycle riding. One is explicit learning means learn through experience or physical effort and another is implicit learning means learning by following bookish guidelines. The student who follow the earlier attempt learning to ride on bicycle was more easily and fastly than the later student. Although the earlier student has gone through many real life attempts to learn by falling to the ground, sores his ankles etc. But finally he got success very fast. As you can see that learning by applying real life circumstances is more helpful to attain the desire goal than recalling only bookish knowledge.
Another reason is that learning by experiencing life is always productive for leadership development as well as great discovery in the arena of science and technology. The world is maintained by leader and technocrat, who are praised, followed by us because they promoted themselves in a position by experiencing real life scenarios rather than following prejudiced learning system that is limited in the book cover. For instance, the discovery of the theory of relativity by Einistein was possible only because he was contemplating himself in thinking the world daily lives, the planet system, the light and its embedded properties. Another discovery in technological development by Wright Brothers was possible because they were being fascinated by seeing or observing the flight of birds rather than learning from book. In the field of leadership development, the prime minister of India is Narendo Modhi who was in his earlier life selling tea and he has gone through a wide variety of experiences regarding human life infliction. These experience and examples taught me that following real life is the ultimate source of the ongoing world.
In sum, some would disagree by supporting learning only from book but in long run these learning will not be sustainable. Learning from our lives not only make us pragmatic but also it helps to pave way to build a great leader, scientist etc. Hence, experiencing our lives and our surroundings should be encouraged to learn the most effective way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 932, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
.... But finally he got success very fast. As you can see that learning by applying r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, regarding, so, well, for example, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2668.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 519.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14065510597 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81829040914 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.499036608863 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 820.8 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8125435512 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.166666667 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182673066359 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547504577013 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507115741327 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120532170515 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028335041649 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.