The presence of restaurants and shopping centers near residential zones has always been a controversial topic. Some people believe that living in a place near a restaurant is hard and annoying because of the problems that they would face such as noises, smells etc.; others would disagree. In my view, the advantage of living near these places over weigh the disadvantages for the following reasons.
First and foremost, building a restaurant in a place would bring abundant job opportunities and investments to the place. A restaurant would attract a lot of people to the place. Thus, when a place becomes crowded other businesses would appear in the place. For instance, when I was a child my family lived in a quiet place in a far distance from the center of the town. My father was a teacher and he spent a lot of time in traffic jams to drive to work. We did not even have a school in our neighborhood. When I was five, they built a restaurant in our neighborhood. As the restaurant had great foods, a lot of people had come to the place every day. The restaurant brought tremendous changes to our environment. After some time the place became bustling and small businesses started to flourish. About two years later, we had lived in a great place where a lot of people had come to visit it each day. Not only the noises and smells did not annoy us, but also the traffics was not our problem anymore, because they built a great school in the place where my father started to work there. As you can see, having a restaurant in the place would bring a lot of pros to the residents.
Second, the restaurant would bring a lot of joy to the residents. Because people can spend a lot of time with their families in the restaurant and also the mayor would build a lot of recreational areas in the place by the money that he earns from the restaurant and other businesses that would appear in the place after building the restaurant. For example, three years ago, when I moved into my new apartment, there was a restaurant in my neighboring. At first, I was afraid that it would bother me. But after some time, the mayor built a fantastic park in our place. Now, not only I spend a lot of time in the restaurant with my friends, but also after that we spent all time in the park talking about different subjects. As it is clear, a restaurant would bring lots of fun and happiness to the lives of local people.
In sum, though some may believe that a restaurant would bring a lot of cons to the environment, as you can see the pros of living in such a place are far more important. I think all mayors have to build a restaurant in their states. It would definitely make the place a lot better and raise the quality of lives of people who live there.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, thus, for example, for instance, i think, such as, talking about, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2243.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 506.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43280632411 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57355736658 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.403162055336 0.524837075471 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 687.6 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 12.0 3.51792114695 341% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3069570931 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2692307692 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42307692308 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0692313086906 0.236089414692 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0291231711718 0.076458572812 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269586260252 0.0737576698707 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0509849018016 0.150856017488 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00703886652332 0.0645574589148 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.61 8.01818996416 82% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.