It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends?
The friendship connection always is one of the challenging relationships between humans. in this type of relations, it is very difficult for people to adjust the right manner of many issues with their friends. One of the essential problems with friends is honest with each other, and in my opinion, the whole truth with friends is unachievable in the real world. In the following paragraphs, I will elucidate my viewpoint.
Firstly, people cannot absolute honesty with their friends because it can be a harmful effect on their communications. In many situations, friends cannot accept all aspects of the character of their friends, or understand precisely the situation where they do some things. Therefore, if people truthful with their friends, others will get a misconception from personality's of them, or judge the decision they did under this condition. This trend between friends creat some debate and annoyance between individuals and have a destructive effect on their relationships. Hence, sometimes we being compelled to behave dishonesty, and so it is impossible to achieve a pure truthful with friends and maintain a relationship with them. For example, I remember when I was studying in undergraduate, I jointed one group that had activities that were opposed to my close friend's beliefs. I decided to perform based on the truth and talked about all of my activities in this group to her. When my friend understood this fact about me, we had a terrible fight about this issue and my activities in that group; in fact, she judged me and rebuked me for them. From this experience, I learned we never should completely truthful with our friends for protecting our friendship.
Moreover, people believe some affairs or activities just related to their personal life, but this view can become a barrier for fully honest with their friends. Indeed, many individuals do not talk about their problems or sad events such as financial problems, or their diseases with their friends, because they embarrassed to talk about them with other people. Nevertheless, sometimes their problems somehow related to the connection with their friends, and when they inform, they accuse to dishonesty in their friendship. Therefore, not to mention some personal issues can create a lack of a verity between friends. These situations are unavoidable, so it is unrealizable to achieve a pure honestness between friends. For instance, one research did at Michigan university shows that 70% of Asthma patients do not say about their disease to their friends because they think it is about their personal life. Also, they are embarrassed to talk about it until they have an Asthmatic attack and need to help from their friends. Usually, after these events, they face with friends that complain from this hypocrisy.
Consequently, it is impossible that persons honest with their friends because sometimes they try to guard their relationship with them, and do not destroy it with some problems. Additionally, there are many issues that people think these are only related to their personal lives and do not see any necessity to talk about them with their friends, but these can create some barriers to achieve a pure truthful in their friendship.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: is always
The friendship connection always is one of the challenging relationships be...
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
...allenging relationships between humans. in this type of relations, it is very diff...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 89.0 43.0788530466 207% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 83.0 52.1666666667 159% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2710.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 525.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1619047619 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82832835255 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447619047619 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 807.3 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7413197723 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.826086957 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8260869565 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47826086957 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216741173971 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789421207631 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811112728265 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164882011914 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504978874476 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.