Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the Internet Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? “It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the Internet.” Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Today, select appropriate materials for researching is an essential aspect of the work of each scholar. Some people believe the printed material is better and more reliable than other resources. I firmly disagree with this idea. I will elucidate my opinion in the following paragraphs.

Firstly, the use of physical books waste of time and energy of scholars than the internet for research. in the modern world, based on the new lifestyle of people, time is the critical factor for chose an option between several available options for doing an activity. Indeed, always access to printed material is challenging for everyone because they should spend a lot of time buying these materials or should borrow them from libraries. On the contrary, internet-based materials are always accessible because of the prevalence usage of the internet. Hence, in this way, researchers can save their valuable time for essential parts of their work than waste a lot of time to find their research material. My own experience demonstrates this fact. When I went to university, one of my courses had a project that I should have extracted a lot of information from a book. I tried to find this book in all book shops throughout the city and public libraries. I lost my time in access to it, but I could not find that. Finally, I found it on the internet easily and used it on my project. As a result, find printed resources can consume the time of researchers and prevent them from doing useful activities.

Secondly, the science in books and printed resources are more limited and older than the internet-based knowledge for research. in the modern era, the rate of producing knowledge is much faster than ever before. Publishing a book is a time-consuming process so that during this long process, many pieces of information in a book lose its validity and becomes useless. Thus, today's many writers use the internet to aware other enthusiastic readers read their new innovations and researches. Indeed, researchers should use the internet to access new awareness in each field. For example, in my working field, which is computer science, knowledge changes at the cutting-edge of technology. In fact, for research in this field, we never use printed material because the data and technic explained on them expire with new methods each year, actually before they published.

In conclusion, the physical resources are not suitable for research today. Finding these books waste the time of scholars and take them away from focusing on critical parts of their works. Additionally, these materials usually have expired and old information in many fields because of the long process of their publishing.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...cholars than the internet for research. in the modern world, based on the new life...
^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... internet-based knowledge for research. in the modern era, the rate of producing k...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2252.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0835214447 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80349905082 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494356659142 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.9 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.9155804274 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.08 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.72 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23771774788 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740295942598 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618134641412 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144031424349 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061178988395 0.0645574589148 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.