Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
“Human activity is making the earth a worse place to live.” Use specific reasons
and examples to support your answer.
Recent activities of humans change many things on the planet that live on that. One group of people believe that during these activities, the Earth becomes a comfortable place for living. I firmly disagree with this idea and belief that our planet was a very good place for our life before these changes. In the following paragraphs, I will elucidate my opinion.
Firstly, human activities have destroyed many natural resources, which are crucial sources for surviving humans, so situations for life on Earth have become severe. From the past time, people always have depended on natural resources for providing their initial need for living on Earth, but humans have increased the greenhouse effect and global warming with their recent activities. Therefore, this situation has overshadowed the balance of seasons and has influenced the temperature of many areas over the globe, so it has changed the natural environment of them. For example, the north area of my country from ancient times had an ideal condition for cultivating the livestock. After years, when the temperature of this area has increased due to global warming and has devastated the greenery. Thus, north areas have become hotter, and shepherds could not find enough grasslands for feeding their cows and sheep. Therefore, my country lost one critical area in fostering livestock and providing red meat, which is one of the basic needs of each society.
Secondly, the new activities of individuals have decreased pleasant feelings of life for all people that live on Earth. One of the critical effects of the environment on individuals is always exuding a sense of joy to them with the viewing of jungles or seeing the beautiful creatures near themselves. Vividly, in the recent century with developing the urban place in each area, people rarely can see these Pristine and untouched views and enjoy them. For instance, my grandfather was saying to me about his memory, and when he was a child. He was speaking about swimming in rivers and playing in near forests with other friends and the happy time that they had in nature. On the contrary, my nephew, who has five years old, lives in a small apartment in a big city. Nevertheless, he has very limited access to outdoor natural experiences, and he is upset and sad usually. As a result, the activities of people on Earth have a tremendously bad effect on the mental health of individuals.
In conclusion, I believe that the recent activities of humans have made our planet a very bad place to live. Humans ruin big parts of Earth in an inevitable and quick speed, which are critical sources for surviving of all individuals. Additionally, these activities affect on pleasant emotions of many people, and the level of mental health has a significant decrease in consequence of these activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: PAST_TIME
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
...e on Earth have become severe. From the past time, people always have depended on natural...
Line 5, column 706, Rule ID: HAVE_CD_YEARS
Message: This phrase is used with 'be': 'is five years old'.
Suggestion: is five years old
...nature. On the contrary, my nephew, who has five years old, lives in a small apartment in a big ci...
Line 7, column 267, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
...viduals. Additionally, these activities affect on pleasant emotions of many people, and t...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, speaking about, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2359.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0405982906 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72176514699 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502136752137 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 741.6 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8612822923 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.227272727 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135806526842 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045627737037 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415673518505 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105092585786 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038375335476 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.