Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
“It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a large city.” Use
specific reasons and examples to develop your essay.
A suitable place for growing kids is one of the significant concerns of all people. One group of individuals think that children should grow in the central part of cities because it is very comfortable for parents and children. I firmly believe that grow in the countryside place is decidedly better for the lives of children. In the following paragraphs, I will elucidate my opinion.
Firstly, growing in rural places is very better for the mental health of young people than in the center of cities. To be more specific, one of the most critical aspects of mental health is cultivating the children in a calm environment and a place that can provide a suitable situation for playing and having outdoor Nature Experiences. The rural areas are away from noises which creat with the crowd of people and cars in a city. Additionally, these places have many vast terrains near to natural resources such as jungles and rivers. Vividly, Children need big sites and houses for playing, so they cannot do many plays in apartment houses that many people live at them in the central part of cities. For example, I remember my grandfather's house was in a place away from the city. Always we wanted from our parents to go to this place because this house was huge and peaceful, so we could have a pleasant time on the river that was near to that home. Hence, the home of my grandfather created a very suitable place to grow for all of his offspring with its calm.
Secondly, the countryside is a perfect place to preserve the health of children than the central part of the city. To be more specific, the central area of cities is always very crowded, and the possibility of propagating infectious diseases from other people to a child is very high. Additionally, in the modern era, the overuse of vehicle creat many problems in air pollution and cause of many sicknesses, which is very dangerous for the fragile lung of kids. For example, when my sister was kids, my family lived in a small apartment in the central place of a big city. This place always had terrible traffic and very pollutions, so my sister has been suffering from asthma ever since. As a result, if my parents lived in a place that was far from this polluted place, my sister now would have a better health situation.
In conclusion, children should grow in the countrysides. Vividly, in this way, not only will they have better physical health but also they will have a pleasant childhood and better mental health.
- At one high school more of its students than ever before have been caught cheating on their homework assignments For example many students have asked other students to provide them with answers for assignments The school is considering making a change to 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Human activity is making the earth a worse place to live Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer51
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the Internet Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a large city Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 786, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER
Message: The adverb 'Always' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...ouse was in a place away from the city. Always we wanted from our parents to go to thi...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6995412844 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57551038135 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454128440367 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.0 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2131957023 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.45 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14500445732 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600683028177 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529127452639 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112460830273 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060151701176 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.