it is more appropriate when we understand some one's mistake, wait until the end of the class or meeting and when people are gone, then talk to the teacher or lecturer about the mistake
Today all around the world, every type of knowledge is expanding a lot, and even people with high degrees have to update themselves constantly. So, it is normal and it may happen to everyone to make a mistake in his/her teaching or lecture. I believe that it is more appropriate when we understand some one's mistake, wait until the end of the class or meeting and when people are gone, then talk to the teacher or lecturer about the mistake. I feel this way because of two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First, I strongly believe that interrupting people will take not only the lecturer concentration but also the other people's attention who are in the meeting or class . When some one is talking for some people, obviously, he/she needs to be focus on the lecture. And if someone else interrupts the lecturer, they may disrupt her/him and cause the lecturer could not resume the conference. Not only that but also it may disturb other people too; consequently, the whole discipline of the meeting will be disturb. I have an example that demonstrates this situation very well. When I was in high school, one of my classmates had a Bronze Medal in mathematics Olympia, and she was so proud to herself. Every time we had a math class, she wanted to say that she is excellent, so she constantly wanted to correct our teacher mistakenly. As a result, she disturbed all of our attention. As a result, she did not let the teacher continue to her teaching nor did the student learning.
Second, I firmly believe that interrupting people for any reason is so inappropriate and rude. And we should always respect the one who is giving us a lecture. By telling the incorrect point in front of all the people that there are in the meeting, we may make lecturers ashamed in front of them. As a result, they lose their confidence just in a moment and be so stressed out. Consequently, they can not complete the lecture as well as they wished. On the other hand, If we tell them their mistakes after the meeting, they will not get stressful, plus they will be able to finish their lectures very well.
To sum up, I prefer, if someday I will see someone say an incorrect point in the lecture, wait until the end of the meeting, and then tell her/his mistake. Because by this way I do not disrupt the lecturer and the other people in the middle of the lecture, and because it is more respectful to the lecturer to do not point out his/her mistake in front of others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...cturer concentration but also the other peoples attention who are in the meeting or cla...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ttention who are in the meeting or class . When some one is talking for some peopl...
^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
... who are in the meeting or class . When some one is talking for some people, obviously, ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, second, so, then, well, i feel, as a result, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2036.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5548098434 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57731221727 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469798657718 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 640.8 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0781602573 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9523809524 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351236691324 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954728715304 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180546260582 0.0737576698707 245% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230281859975 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154389982553 0.0645574589148 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.