It is more enjoyable to have a job when you always three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you have a job where you work five days a week with shorter hours.
Nowadays, working hours is pivotal portion of people's everyday life, which may exert an influence on their feelings and performance. In effort to enhance employees' conditions, managers and policy makers have implemented several procedures. One of the determining factors related to employees is hours that every one spend per day. In this regard, choosing the best strategy to follow has caused a heated debate. Some people prefer to work three days per week for long hours. while others believe otherwise--that is--being interested "regular" working hours--five work day in a week with shorter hours. The idea to which I subscribe is that working in regular basis as more beneficial. My reasoning is based on quite a few reasons, three conspicuous ones of which have been elaborated upon in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, it incontrovertibly axiomatic that employees have a far-reaching effect on efficiency. Unless they enjoy a decent condition, efficiency will be guaranteed. Often people often loose their effectiveness when they overwork thereby becoming tired. Indeed, the more hours one works, the less quality his or her performance will be. However, by working shorter each day, people often have more energy during the whole work day. Statistics have also demonstrated that companies and organizations in which regular working hours are employed are more successful entities in comparison with otherwise firms.
Additionally, employees tend to have more promotion if their weekdays be in regular fashion. It stands to reason that not only do employees promote quickly, but firing and loosing their careers will be less probable. In contrast, people having less work days usually cannot do their best, which results they will not be able to flourish their potentials. However, regular basis work hours is similar to a double-edged sword which has it's own disadvantages like increasing traffic congestion, and spending more time for heating and cooling facilities. Despite this, managers and authoritative should bite the bullet and attempt to find other alternative solutions than reducing work days to overcome or at least alleviate these problems.
Eventually, working five days a week results in better relationship with family members. The irony of this situation is that at the first glance, it seems that by having more free time, people can spend time with their families. However, in reality spending much time with each other, some conflicts may be occurred between family members. As a result, far-sighted people often do not take working in regular basis for granted.
All in all, I have a penchant for the idea that it is better to work five days a week with short hours because of aforementioned reasons. Therefore, it is highly recommended that governments and other private companies grant their unqualified support to the plan in which all employees should world in regular basis.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 476, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ork three days per week for long hours. while others believe otherwise--that is--bein...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... will be guaranteed. Often people often loose their effectiveness when they overwork ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...effectiveness when they overwork thereby becoming tired. Indeed, the more hours o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, at least, in contrast, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2478.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37527114967 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9225473442 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548806941432 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 757.8 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8960485689 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.12 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.44 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273313031898 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865385884083 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746412777481 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171494480268 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435292204119 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.