It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days for shorter hours. Do you agree or disagree?
Normally, people have to work from Monday to Friday and then enjoy the sweet little break of weekends, but there is an increasingly popular opinion that it would be more advantageous to work only three days a week for prolonge time than the previously mentioned work pattern. I agree with this statement for the following reasons.
To begin with, three days work week enables everyone to spend more time with relatives, which increases family bonding. Working for three days will provide me with two more extra whole days to pass my time with family members. Consequently, we may go on a long tour during those days which would help us to increase the communication between each other. Family members are the closest people in our lives, and we cannot neglect bonds with them.
Secondly, a three-day schedule helps companies to flourish as it increases the efficiency of the employees. We need rest after an intense period of work, and a break from the job helps the workers to refresh their minds For example, my mother now works as a software engineer in a company that has only three working days. Thus, she has enough time to recover from exhausting affairs by resting at home during those weekends. So, my mom returns to work with eagerness and readiness for accomplishing the ambitions of her employers. By using such working practice, her company has made a lot of profit and is doing far better compared to its competitors who have a five-day workweek.
Three days work week allows employees to pass more time with their families, and also helps the company to flourish as it increases the efficiency of its workers. In a nutshell, because working for three days a week is more efficient and more convenient, it is a proper way of working.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 302.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81125827815 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58506648792 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566225165563 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0945395119 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.769230769 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316450839812 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120364785168 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774329738809 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217964609232 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441088278878 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.